Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 1 – Five new
statistics about Russia this past week – one about Muslims in the army, a
second about the state of its roads, a third about the number of illegal
migrants in the country, a fourth about Russian attitudes toward religious
instruction in the schools, and a fifth about public trust in television news –
say far more that a first glance might suggest.
First, Boris Lukichev, the head of
the Russian Armed Forces Administration for Work with Believing Soldiers, said
that “up to 20 percent” of those in uniform are Muslims and that in some units
and districts, their share is much higher. As a result, the military is working
hard to provide them with mullahs and opportunities to attend prayers at
mosques on Fridays (tass-ural.ru/lentanews/v_rossiyskoy_armii_70_prots_voennosluzhashchikh_ispoveduyut_pravoslavie_sotsopros.html).
Luichev’s figures, which he said
were based on a recent poll, are much higher than Russian officials typically
acknowledge, but even more significant is his statement that if a soldier
professes Islam, then “the task of a military religious person is to help him
remain a Muslim in [the Russian] army and on the basis of this religion fulfill
his military obligation.”
Unlike some populist politicians in
Russia who see support by staking out an anti-Islamic position, Russian
commanders appear to have calculated that they are going to be relying so
heavily on Muslim draftees in the future that they cannot afford to do so
whatever their personal inclinations may be.
Second, Konstantin Romodanovsy, the
head of Russia’s Federal Migration Service, said that there are some 10 million
immigrant workers in the Russian Federation at the present time and that 3.3
million of them are there illegally, largely because they have overstayed the
time for which they were admitted (www.fergananews.com/articles/7640).
Most of these are from the countries
of Central Asia, he continued. Not only
are these numbers much higher than he and other Russian officials have admitted
in the past, but they are testimony to the inability of the state to enforce
its immigration laws and to the opposition from businesses to their doing so.
In that, the Russian Federation is
not terribly different from many other countries. But given Russian
expectations about the state and claims by the Kremlin about its commitment to
enforcing the law, this situation is certain to disturb many Russians and
heighten demands for an even tougher approach to immigrants to Russian cities.
Third, the World Economic Forum
announced that the Russian Federation ranks 136th out of 144
countries surveyed in terms of the quality of its highways. Russian roads
compared most closely to those of Mozambique, Guinea, and Mongolia, and were notably
better only than those in Romania, Haiti and Moldova (news.mail.ru/economics/12167419/?frommail=1).
That ranking will not surprise
anyone who has used Russia’s roads, but it represents one of the most important
choke points in that country’s economic and political development. Not only
does this lack of infrastructure limit economic growth, but it limits Moscow’s
options in its relations with its far-flung regions and republics.
Indeed, the political consequences
may be the more important because bad roads mean that Moscow and the regions
are more isolated from one another than they would be if the highways were
better and that the center has fewer levers on the regions and the regions have
more options for avoiding central diktat than would otherwise be the case.
Fourth, the Levada Center reported
today and “Izvestiya” highlighted its finding that “only 22 percent” of
Russians support the introduction of religious instruction in the country’s
schools, a figure that undercuts the ideological plans of both the Kremlin and
the Moscow Patriarchate (izvestia.ru/news/545876 and levada.ru/01-03-2013/rossiyane-o-religioznom-vospitanii).
Opposition
to religious instruction comes not only from non-Orthodox groups such as the
Muslims, but also from those who identify with Orthodoxy but fear that such
courses take too much time away from basic instruction, undercut the secular
nature of the state, and divide rather than unite pupils who are Russia’s
future.
And fifth, the Public Opinion
Foundation reported that while Russians overwhelmingly rely on state-controlled
television for their news, they are increasingly skeptical about what those
channels tell them, a situation that calls in question the Putin regime’s
decision to rely on control of television as opposed to other media outlets (rusnovosti.ru/news/249130/).
Its
poll found that about 90 percent of Russians turn to television for their news,
far more than to Internet sites, radio or the print media, but that the public’s
trust in television has fallen from 52 percent to 45 percent over the last year
as has the percentage of Russians who believe television provides objective
news, 41 percent now as opposed to 47 percent a year ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment