Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 24 – Russians have
long been upset by the influx of Central Asia and Caucasian gastarbeiters, but
now they have an additional reason to be worried about the impact of special
relationships between their country and the former Soviet republics: half of
the illegal capital flight from Russia is going via its customs union partners,
Kazakhstan and Belarus.
For the first time, the Russian
Central Bank has published data on illegal capital flight abroad by means of
illegal declarations of imports from the Customs Union countries. It turns out, Oleg Gladunov writes on the
“Svobodnaya pressa” portal, that the new figures are “worse than anyone
expected” (svpressa.ru/economy/article/69869/).
According to the bank, 10 billion US
dollars of capital is leaving the Russian Federation covered by imaginary
imports from Kazakhstan, and another 15 billion is leaving the country by the
same means through Belarus, out of the total of 49 billion US dollars of
capital flight from Russia in 2012.
This method also means that Russian
data have been overstating the amount of trade the existence of the Customs
Union has produced and understated the collapse of that trade over the last
several years, Vladislav Zhukovsky, an analyst at Rikom-Trust, told “Svobodnaya
pressa,” noting that these declines are overshadowed by the declines in Russian
foreign trade overall.
But “if the worsening of Russia’s
trade balance with countries of the far abroad can be explained by the crisis
in Europe, the chronic inability of Russian bureaucrats to guarantee
competitive advantages … on the post-Soviet space and to extract a profit [from
its integration] is openly stupefying,” the analyst added.
In this regard, Gladunov notes that
“the extent of illegal financial operations with Customs Union countries is
growing very rapidly.” And that in turn
means that “the noble goal of promoting trade and economic cooperation among
the former fraternal republics has been undermined by the growth of criminal
operations, as so often happens in Russia.”
The way in which the Customs Union
operates creates “favorable” conditions for this and has allowed those who want
to send capital abroad the chance to do so by filing false reports that the
money is going to pay for imports from these countries. As there is no customs control at the borders
of the Union, it is very difficult to check which declarations are true and
which false.
But it is quite possible to estimate
the size of such flows, Gladunov says, pointing out that the Central Bank can
do so by doing an analysis of trade flows.
Last year, when it carried out such a study, the Moscow bank dentified
Belarus as a major channel of illegal capital flight; this year, it has added
Kazakhstan to the list.
Such
estimates, however, rest on trade statistics and those in this case are highly
suspect because they rely on the declarations of individual companies. At
present, “only 50 percent” of them provide statistical reports about their
operations. And thus, “it is practically impossible” to specify what is moving
and in which directions between and among these countries.
To try to improve the situation, the
Russian Central Bank has asked banks that handle such transfers of money to
gather more information from the companies involved, but experts say, Gladunov
continues, that the companies and banks are likely to be reluctant to do so,
even more in the case of Kazakhstan than in that of Belarus.
The Belarus National Bank at least
has a data base on goods and financial transfers; Kazakhstan does not, “and to
test the genuineness of documents by which goods are exported will be anything
but simple.” Russian banks are likely to point to that and decide not to follow
the recommendations of the Russian Central Bank.
Given all this, many Russians are
likely to see cooperation with the former Soviet republics as ever less
attractive and to resist efforts by the Kremlin to promote tighter integration.
That could mean that the current push in Russia to establish visa requirements
for Central Asians may soon be followed by one to restrict economic and
financial ties as well.
And that in turn
means that once again the Russian Federation, for all that its leaders talk
about promoting the re-integration of the post-Soviet space, may in fact find
themselves driven to take steps that not only will block greater integration in
the future but walk back some of the moves that Moscow has made in that
direction over the last decade.
No comments:
Post a Comment