Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 25 – Even as Russian
officials once again have begun talking about re-starting Vladimir Putin’s push
for regional amalgamation, representatives of two non-Russian areas which were
absorbed into a larger one are saying that Moscow’s promises that they would be
better off as a result are empty.
Instead, representatives of Taymyr
and Evenkia in the Krasnoyarsk legislative assembly said last week that their
populations were suffering as a result of their amalgamation into the larger
and predominantly ethnic Russian kray in 2007 as many opponents of that move
said at the time (ng.ru/regions/2013-06-24/6_krasnoyarsk.html).
The
Tymyr and Evenk deputies said that in “the inter-season” between when the
rivers are navigable and when they freeze and become ice roads, most goods have
to be shipped north by plane, leading to unconscionable price rises, with milk
costing 200 rubles (6.40 US dollars) a liter, putting such daily necessities
beyond the reach of local people.
Prior
to their amalgamation with Krasnoyarsk, the two then-federal subjects had a
special agreement with Moscow that was intended to keep the prices down. It did not always work as intended, but
Russian officials pushing for the amalgamation of these two northern
territories said during the referendum campaign that they would follow its
provisions and keep prices low.
Not
only have they not done so, the deputies say, but they have suggested that the
2003 agreement between the two and Moscow no longer has any force because it
was signed when they were federal subjects, a status they no longer have.
Anatoly
Amosov, an Evenk deputy, told “Nezavisimaya gazeta” that “prices in the North
are a political question that touches on the result of unification.” Whenever
Krasnoyarsk officials come to the Taymyr or Evenkia, he said, the issue comes
up because their populations are suffering as a result.
The deputies from the two northern
regions have called for the creation of a special working group to control
prices, a group that Amosov said should include parliamentarians, kray
officials and representatives of public organizations.
According to the Moscow paper,
“discussions about the astronomical prices in the former okrugs have become yet
another manifestation of the dissatisfaction of the Notherns with the
social-economic consequences of the unification of the okrugs and the kray
which certain experts prefer to call ‘the swallowing’” of the former by the
latter.
Residents of the two former okrugs
routinely complain about the results of amalgamation and say they would like to
see it reversed. (See ng.ru/regions/2012-05-30/5_separatizm.html.) In
addition to the price hikes, they point to the fact that they have to fly
enormous distances in order to get the necessary documents from kray officials.
Political
scientist Sergey Komaritsyn suggested that the problems the residents of these
two northern regions are “systemic,” arguing that “in the conditions of the Far
North, market laws do not work.” For the people there to survive, the
government must introduce correctives including subsidies.
Until
that happens, he said, dissatisfaction is likely to grow. “The strategic mistake of the kray
authorities is that they have treated Taymyr and Evenkia are being treated like
any other districts.” That needs to change given their special needs, and he
suggested that it would not be a bad idea for the kray to create the post of
deputy governor for northern affairs.
No comments:
Post a Comment