Paul Goble
Staunton,
August 20 – Russian Orthodox activists have announced plans to create a Center
for the Struggle with Atheist Extremism, the latest example of one of the more
troubling phenomena in the Russian Federation and other former communist
countries: the continuing use of Bolshevik-style measures in the pursuit of
explicitly anti-Communist goals.
Often
those who support the new goals both in these countries and in the West are
inclined to overlook or even approve such approaches as necessary or laudable even
though such methods themselves often have the effect of undermining the goals
as well, however laudable the new ones may be.
And
this problem is exacerbated or at least extended into the future because many
of those now engaged in the pursuit of new goals are the same ones who avidly
pursued the old ones in Soviet times, a situation that reduces the confidence
one might have that any particular shift is likely to be permanent.
A
clear example of this is the announcement by Russian Orthodox activists,
students and instructors from Moscow State University, and officials of the
Russian capital’s Western Administrative District of plans to create a center
whose very title resembles with the change of a single word the kind of
institution the Soviets used (interfax-religion.ru/?act=news&div=52396).
According
to a resolution adopted by the supporters of this idea, “’atheistic extremism’
sponsored by various foundations and NGOs whose roots are to be found beyond
theborders of Russia have raised its head. These ‘atheistic extremists’ work against
the legal rights of citizens guaranteed by Article 28 of the Constitution of
the Russian Federation.”
Some
Russians, the resolution continues, oppose the construction of churches, “having
created an artificial psychosis and spreading hysteria by means of confusion
citizens” by referring to “non-existent laws which supposedly do not allow
churches to be closer than a kilometer from residences.”
Moreover, such Russians complain about the supposed
destruction of parks to allow for churches, although these same people, the
resolution says, never complain about “all other construction.” Moreover, such “’atheistic extremists’
present themselves as representatives of local residents by creating
self-proclaimed ‘social councils’ and ‘initiative groups’ while keeping
themselves in the shadows.”
Such
language, albeit directed against religious belief instead of opposition to religion,
could have been found in almost any Soviet newspaper, yet another way in which
the confusion of ends and means continues to affect life in these countries and
the evaluation of it by those who live elsewhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment