Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 14 –Russia’s
demographic decline is taking many forms – the disappearance of villages, the hollowing
out of the countryside and difficulties with meeting draft quotas and having
enough working age people to support an aging population – but perhaps the most
dramatic is the predicted disappearance of relatively large cities like
Ivanovo.
As reported in yesterday’s “Rossiiskaya
gazeta,” scholars at the University of California predict that Ivanovo, which
currently has 448,000 residents, will simply disappear from the face of the earth
by the year 2100 because there will not be anyone left to live there (rg.ru/2014/01/13/reg-cfo/ivanovo-anons.html).
Ten other large Russian cities will
also likely disappear, the researchers said, along with five Ukrainian urban
areas, and one each in Armenia and Georgia in and a variety expand rapidly,
with 21 of the 31 fastest growing cities in the world located in the Peoples
Republic, a reflection of the rapidity of demographic shifts.
(An even more dramatic shift was reported
in the England and Wales yesterday. There, almost ten percent of the children
under five are Muslims while only one half of one percent of those over 85 are,
a pattern that points to a rapid increase in the overall Muslim share of the population
Muslims in the coming decades (svoboda.org/content/article/25226428.html).)
In an analysis
of the California projections on the “Svobodnaya pressa” portal, Svetlana
Gomzikova says that Ivanovo’s disappearance if it happens will be the product
of the lack of industry, the flight of youth to Moscow, falling birthrates
despite an unchanged gender balance, and rising mortality (svpressa.ru/society/article/80458/).
These projections are somewhat at
variance with those offered by United Nation experts in 2012. The latter
pointed to Nizhny Novgorod as the Russian city which is losing population most rapidly
– a projected 12 percent by 2025 – followed by Novosibirsk, Omsk, Chelyabinsk,
Volgograd and Voronezh (unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=3387).
Gomzikova spoke with Denis Vizgalov,
a geographer who heads the Living Cities Company, about these projections. He
was dismissive, suggesting that such predictions are made “not to predict the life
of cities” but to advertise the companies which make them. Such self-promotion,
he said, is to be found “in all branches of science.”
At the same time, he acknowledged
that “many Russian cities will disappear from the map over the next 50 years.” But these will not be major cities but
smaller ones, who are far less capable of finding new directions and attracting
population from the countryside. Russian cities under 30,000 and those with
only one industry are especially at risk.
In contrast, cities with more than 500,000
have many resources which will allow them to survive even if they go through
difficult times. Ivanovo is near the
dividing line, but Vizgalov said he believes it belong with the larger and
potentially thriving urban centers than with the smaller and dying ones.
Russians have focused on the problem
of single-industry company towns, the “monogorods.” Those are places in which
more than a quarter of the population works in one branch and more than a
quarter of production comes from that. But in doing so, both ordinary Russians
and the Russian state forget how varied these places are, Vizgalov said.
Some are scientific centers, some
are mining centers, some are industrial centers. As a result, “the financial
situation and even the standard of living in them is very, very different.
Different problems require different solutions, “but all our government programs
directed at the development of the monogorods ... approach them with one and
the same medicine.”
Some
company towns will benefit from a simple influx of cash, but others won’t. Such
outside funding will help if and only if it changes the economic structure of
these cities. Sometimes that is possible, but in many cases it isn’t. And of the roughly 400 Russian company towns –
a third of all Russian cities – some ten to 15 will disappear in the next two
decades.
Those most at risk
are places based on industrial production, extraction industries, and northern
cities where climatic conditions are bad.
In short, Vizgalov said, “these are cities which have not been able to
find a reason for their existence after the dismantling of the Soviet planned
economy. They are now in the most difficult situation.”
No comments:
Post a Comment