Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 19 – Aleksandr Dugin,
the Eurasianist leader who enjoys enormous influence in the Kremlin, says that
countries adjoining the Russian Federation “can preserve their territorial
integrity only by maintaining good relations with Russia” and that those who
cross Moscow can have no such expectations.
In an interview published in “Yerkramas,”
a newspaper directed at the Armenian community in the Russian Federation, Dugin
reiterated and then extended comments he made after Azerbaijan voted at the
United Nations in the support of Ukraine’s territorial integrity (yerkramas.org/2014/04/17/segodnya-karabax-armyanskij-potomu-chto-armyane-dogovorilis-s-rossiej-dugin/comment-page-1/).
Dugin recalled to the Armenian
publication that he had said that “Russia is the guarantor of the territorial integrity
of each post-Soviet country. Russia is also the guarantor of the territorial
integrity of Armenia and Azerbaijan, and it is also the guarantor of Karabakh
as well.”
Were Russia to give up these
functions, something it is not about to do, Dugin continued, “then the
territorial integrity of Armenia and Karabakh will not be guaranteed to the extent
that Russia is a proportional power and naturally countries in the one adjoining
Russia can preserve their territorial integrity exclusively by maintaining good
relations with Russia.”
That means that these states “must
be either neutral or have close ties,” he said. If they adopt “an anti-Russian
policy,” then doubts will arise about the maintenance of their current borders.
Dugin said this is “what he had in
mind. I have told this to the Azerbaijanis, the Armenians, the Gerogians, the
Moldovans, and the Ukrainians. I have
been saying this for more than 15 years.
This fact is shown by South Osetia, Abkhazia, Transdniestria, Crimea and
also by Karabakh because Karabakh at present is Armenian because the Armenians
have agreed with Russia.”
By voting against Moscow at the UN,
he continued, Azerbaijan has “challenged” Moscow just as Saakashvili and the Kyiv
junta did, and we already know how that policy ends. [Moreover,] in Azerbaijan, there exists the
Talysh factor and the Lezgin factor,” and many others, “the seriousness of
which Azerbaijan does not imagine.”
According to Dugin, “Russia has many
levers when it speaks in a friendly language and in the language of dialogue
and it has others when it uses hostile language.” The Eurasianist and sometime Kremlin advisor
adds that he “is not threatening anyone” with these remarks.
As far as Karabakh is concerned,
Dugin said, Moscow “even in extreme circumstances” won’t recognize the
independence of that region because “the current situation suits Russia.” Moscow
will use other measures first although Karabakh remains “a weapon [for it] which
has so far not been fired.”
Armenia has shown its support for
Moscow by its vote at the UN, while “Azerbaijan unexpectedly betrayed us,”
Dugin says. Moscow will approach the
future of its ties with the two taking their very different positions into
account. But there are continuing reasons for its current approach to the
Karabakh dispute.
“By not recognizing the independence
of Karabakh,” Dugin says, “Russia retains the opportunity for the development
of diplomatic relations with Azerbaijan,” “a serious regional country with
which Russia has numerous historical, economic and geopolitical ties.” Moscow thereby
“accepts the fact that Karabakh belongs to Armenia but de jure is part of
Azerbaijan.”
In short, the Eurasian leader says, “Russia
de facto supports Armenia but de jure agrees with Azerbaijan. Russia could recognize the independence [of
Karabakh] but there would have to be arguments for this. For example, if the Azerbaijanis sought to
completely break their ties with us, then we would move in that direction.”
No comments:
Post a Comment