Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 18 – Many commentators
in Moscow and the West see parallels between Vladimir Putin’s regime and Adolf
Hitler’s Nazi one – its authoritarianism, its attacks on minorities and its
pursuit of Lebensraum for “the Russian world.” But Igor Eidman takes the next
step and draws specific parallels between Nazi figures and Russian ones.
By doing so, the Moscow commentator
shows both the numerous ways in which the leaders of Putin’s “Reich” resemble
those of Hitler’s and also the equally numerous ways in which the current
regime is only a pale reflection of the one defeated in 1945 and tried at
Nuremberg (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5419B46A8E11F).
But perhaps the most important
conclusions his article suggests are two that he does not draw. On the one
hand, his listing shows just how large a number of senior officials are
involved in the policies of the Putin regime. And on the other, it indicates
that the departure of Putin from office would hardly be enough to prevent a
recurrence.
Instead, what would be needed is
another update from the past: the de-Putinization of Russia lest the next tier
of leaders lead to its metastasis under one of them.
Among the Russian equivalents to
Nazi figures Eidman suggests are: Kabayeva as “our ‘Eva Braun,’” Surkov as
Goebbels, Shoygu as Keitel, Bastrykin as Himmler, Sechin as Bormann, Medvedev
as Goering, Lavrov as Ribbentrop, the FSB as the Gestapo, and the Russian Defense Ministry as the German Wehrmacht.
But besides these parallels, there
are some very important differences, Eidman writes. The FSB-Gestapo “in general seeks not enemies
of the Reich but rather is a racket” which is seeking to pocket as much in
corrupt cash as it can. And the Defense Ministry-Wehrmacht is prepared to sell
off military equipment and cash in as well.
Moreover, he continues, “Every one
of our ‘Reich ministers’ or SS Gruppenfuehrers-FSB officers has a house in
London or a villa in Cannes. And the ‘Gauleiters’ (governors) in general have
ceased thinking about the interests of the Reich.”
“And where is ‘the Fuhrer’s concern
about Germans’ (that is, Russians)? Where are the new autobahns, ‘strength
through joy,’ inexpensive housing and cruises for workers?” None of that is
present because “all our successes are in the sphere of propaganda” rather than
reality. In that, Putin’s Russia has left Goebbels’ Germany in the dust.
But underneath those differences
there are fundamental commonalities, Eidman says. “The main thing is this: Our
Reich also wants to take revenge for defeat in war, in this case in the Cold
War.” It too wants “Lebensraum” and is “successfully” pursuing that idea via
the Russian world idea.
The Putin regime has united “’our ‘Austria’
(Crimea),” it has dismembered our ‘Czechoslovakia (Ukraine),” and like the
regime of which it is a dim mirror, its leaders may ultimately stand in
judgment before the world via “our” very own Nuremberg trial.
No comments:
Post a Comment