Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 11 – Vladimir
Putin wants to impose a North Korean-type of control over the Internet,
according to Russian blogger Anton Nosik; but the costs such closure will
impose on the Russian economy, the ability of Russian surfers to work around
his actions, and, last but not least, the linguistic diversity of the country
may keep that goal beyond his reach.
In an interview published in today’s
“Novyye izvestiya,” Nosik says that people are wrong to think that Putin only
plans to go as far as China has. Instead, the blogger argues, the Kremlin
leader wants to control the Internet in the way that the North Korean regime
does (newizv.ru/society/2014-09-11/207527-bloger-anton-nosik.html).
“The Chinese variant,” he says, “is
much freer than that which [the Kremlin] is preparing for us.” In China, people
have the access they need for almost everything because local officials want to
promote the development of sites and because Beijing knows that it will not be
able to attract the foreign specialists it needs if they can’t gain access to
Facebook.
In Russia, however, local officials
have no interest in promoting the growth and capitalization of local sites, and
Moscow is counting in part on that as it moves to impose controls that will
resemble those now operating in North Korea, a totalitarian regime far more cut
off from the world than is China.
Up to now, Nosik says, Moscow has
sought to block this or that site, often with many mistakes and in ways that those
who use the Internet regularly know how to “get around in a minute.” But now the Kremlin is moving to control
access to foreign sites by imposing a monopoly on access to them via its
control of the limited number of access lines.
But any victory it achieves with
this program, Nosik says, is likely to be quickly undermined by the development
of satellite accessible Internet. Indeed, “the stronger will be [the Russian
government’s] pressure, the more rapidly it will develop.” In Soviet times,
people responded with the typewriter and samizdat.
Now, some Russians will do something
similar. Those who gain access to satellite Internet will then distribute what
they get from the World Wide Web within the Russian segment of the Internet,
something Moscow will have far more difficulty preventing without imposing
enormous economic costs on itself, Nosik suggests.
There is yet another reason why the
Russian government will face a harder time than it imagines in imposing a North
Korean “solution” to the Internet, although it is not one Nosik mentions in
this article. That is the enormous linguistic diversity within the Russian
Federation and the difficulty, even impossibility of monitoring and blocking
all non-Russian sites and blogs.
An article on Finnougr.ru this week
calls attention to the fact that there are now six blogs in the Komi language
for a linguistic community of fewer than 250,000. They are becoming a source of
first importance for that group, and the challenge of monitoring everything
they are putting out is likely well beyond the capacity of Russian-speaking
Moscow to do (finnougr.ru/news/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=12116).
Indeed, these non-Russian-language sites
may become more of a threat to Moscow than those containing the commentaries of
Moscow intellectuals. According to Ono Lav, a specialist on Finno-Ugric
languages, the Komi blogs not only keep the language alive but help revive and
develop the national identity of that people.
“Our people,” he says, “will see that
people speaking Komi not only live a real life but also write in Komi about that
life.” That will change their mentality and “positively impact on national
identity” by helping Komis to overcome their traditional “pessimism” about the future
of their community and its “loss of roots and one another.”
Indeed, Lav says, “the active
participation of our fellow citizens in the formation and support of a Komi
blogosphere can have as its result the formation of a Komi language community”
in which the sharing of information and ideas will lead to “the strengthening
in the region of civic consciousness.”
No comments:
Post a Comment