Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 30 – Russians like
other people are “too lazy to hate anyone for very long,” according to Moscow
ethnographer Igor Savin. Instead, “after a few months,” they will shift the
object of their xenophobia from one group to another, sometimes as a result of
official actions and other times as a result of their own experiences.
A few people do hate this or that
group more or less permanently, the researcher at the Institute of Oriental
Studies says, but most, while they seem to need to focus on some kind of enemy
to define themselves, seldom do so, shifting the object of their dislike or
hatred from one to another over time (novayagazeta.ru/society/67053.html).
Consequently,
their current “hatred” of Ukrainians is unlikely to last more than a few
months, just as their earlier hostility to immigrants from Central Asia or
hatred of Georgia in 2008, Savin told the Moscow paper’s Elena Racheva in the
course of an extensive interview in today’s edition.
The
ethnographer’s conclusions are the product of his participation in a year-long
study he and his colleagues have carried about concerning relations between
native Muscovites and Central Asian gastarbeiters, a study that involved more than
40 focus groups as well as in-depth interviews with members of both groups.
“Everyone
has always had the need to channel hatred,” he says. The difference in how that
happens often depends on whether “government and social institutes extinguish
it” by one means or another or “in our case, use it” for their own purposes and
thus legitimize and intensify it.
“The
level of migrantophobia has declined” over the past year, he says, with “half
of the phobia and that not to a high degree now directed at Ukraine,” a shift
he says that has little to do with the experiences of people but rather with the
efforts of the media to direct anger away from one group and toward another.
There
are no non-xenophobes, Savin argues, because “people who do not experience some
form of distrust to other groups, real or imagined, do not exist.” Russians have been unwilling to face up to
that fact in large measure because they continue to “exaggerate the
internationalist quality of Russia” that supposedly was inherited from Soviet
times.
In
reality, he continues, “in the USSR there were so few ‘others’ present” in
Russian cities that “all Soviet nationalism was controlled.” There were simply
too few targets of opportunity as it were. Immigration has only been a serious
thing over the last decade, and “people still haven’t reached an understanding
as to how they should think about it.”
The
government could help calm the situation if it would be honest and say that “’we
have few citizens and we need new human material, however cynical that sounds.” Immigrants thus play a valuable role, and “if
they do not violate the law, then they are equal to us in the rights but also
equal in their responsibilities.”
“I
also say to colleagues: we do not need migrantophilia or migrantophobia; we
need migrantorealism. Migrants are also people: they act according to the very same
laws” that others do. Moreover, he says,
migrants in Moscow typically say they are being treated “better than is in fact
the case” because they do not want to exacerbate the situation.
Asked
who is the object of Russian dislike now, Savin cities the findings of a 2013
poll. At that time, Russians identified
Belarusians and Russians as those closest to them and against whom they felt
the least hostility. “Following them were the Jews, then the Armenians and the
Georgians. Then, the Azerbaijanis, Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz and Tajiks.”
And
the three groups Russians at that time said they felt the greatest xenophobia
aobut were the Chinese, the Chechens and the Roma. “Certainly,” their attitudes
toward Ukrainians have changed, Savin says, “but what is surprising is
something else. In 2007-2008, there was an anti-Georgian campaign, and it
seemed that Russians would hate Georgians forever.”
But
only a couple of years later, most Russians viewed the Georgians in a positive
light, and almost none of them saw that Caucasian people as an enemy.
No comments:
Post a Comment