Staunton, January 14 – Moscow has
unleashed a powerful wave of “black propaganda” against Belarus, often using
Belarusians who now live in the Russian Federation to do it. But that effort,
ostensibly designed to counter Western and Ukrainian propaganda, is alienating
Belarusians and making cooperation between the two countries in the union state
more difficult.
That is the judgment of Vladimir
Abtsugov, a Belarusian writer who wants the union state to succeed, on a
phenomenon few have focused on up to now as offered in the current issue of the
influential Russian military-political journal “Voyenno-politicheskoye
obozreniye” (belvpo.com/ru/47441.html).
Russia and Belarus, he begins, are
allies and members of a union state. But that doesn’t mean that they do not
have differences and even disputes, especially since “the Belarusian state is
at the point of contact between Eastern and Western civilizations” and thus is
the site of a permanent ideological struggle.
That
is “an objective reality” which no one should ignore, and “since the moment of
the acquisition by our country of independence,” Abtsugov argues, “the
intensity of the conflict between East and West has steadily grown.”
Most
of the propaganda in this conflict comes from the West which always has had the
goal of “weakening Russia” and seeks to find “the weak links” among the
countries around Russia’s periphery which are friendly to Moscow. And some of
it comes from Ukraine, especially in the period since the Maidan.
Moscow
and Mensk should be able to solve their differences like friends with talks, “but
to the enormous regret [of Belarus] … periodically uses dirty technologies taken
from the West’s conduct of information wars,” something that should be “categorically
impermissible” and that is in the present case counterproductive.
Russian
outlets find this easy to do not only because Moscow has “an incomparably large
apparatus of political propaganda” but also because Russians and Russian
speakers in Belarus rely on Russian media for much of their news, information
and opinion. Tragically, Moscow has used these advantages in a destructive way
by conducting itself like “a bull in a china shop.”
“One
must not say that such actions are the official position of Russia,” especially
since the Russian government and the government media generally act quite
correctly. “But a certain part of the Russian media belongs to private
corporations which allows the latter to be used for all sorts of ‘delicate’
affairs.”
“These
[Russian] corporations support political analysts, economists, experts and journalists
who specialize in the Belarusian direction, people like Andrey Suzdaltsev,
Pavel Sheremet, Nikolay Radov, and Yury Baranchik and uses them like a
battering ram in propaganda wars.”
Baranchik
is a good example of this, Abtsugov says. Born in Belarus, he recently moved to
Russia and has earned his keep there by “regularly pouring dirt on his country
and its leadership,” something he has proved ready and willing to do. Recently, his employers have asked him to go
further and he has even suggested that Belarusians do not exist as a people.
He
thus requires that Belarusians forget all their history except that when they
have been tied to Russia, a demand that is inherently offensive to the more
than 80 percent of the Belarusian population who identify as Belarusians. And
it invites responses from them that many Russians would not like.
“For
example,” Abtsugov says, “one could assert that the Russian Empire was Russian
only by name because Peter I was the first and last emperor who was purely
Russian by nationality, and all the rest were in one or another degree Germans.
Therefore, tsarist Russia never was an independent state but rather was under concealed
foreign rule.”
What
can this lead to? The obvious answer is
anger and dissatisfaction with Russia among Belarusians. While most want good relations with Russia, “ever
more often can one hear out of the mouths of ordinary Belarusians [negative
statements about Moscow] that one would not have heard earlier.”
That
is not just the result of Western or Ukrainian propaganda, he says; it is the
result of the work of Russian outlets like the REX news agency, the Foundation
for Strategic Culture, “Geopolitika,” “Vzglyad,” KM.ru, Regnum “and many
others.” One can only hope that Russia will recognize what these organizations
are doing.
“Unfortunately,”
Abtsugov says, “the Russian propaganda apparatus is directed at promoting anger”
rather than promoting friendship. The latter requires “completely different approaches.
National and religious feelings are a very delicate instrument, and one must
not allow those with less than clean hands to play on them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment