Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 18 – An article
about a Tajik protest in February 1925 that blocked the train of Soviet leader
Mikhail Kalinin and forced Moscow to revise Tashkent’s approach to its Tajik
minority and then change the border between the two Central Asian republics in
Tajikistan’s favor has proven to have more than historical interest.
On the one hand, numerous comments
posted on it show that Tajiks still feel very strongly about what they see as
Uzbek insensitivity and even oppression of their nation. And on the other, these same comments
highlight the feeling still very much alive among Tajiks that pubic actions can
force the hand of Moscow, Tashkent and Dushanbe.
In an article entitled “How the
People of Konibodom United with Tajikistan,” Tajik journalist Akmal Mannonov
describes an incident that is little known outside the Tajik community but that
is clearly still very much a matter of extreme sensitivity and national pride (news.tj/ru/news/kak-kanibadam-prisoedinilsya-k-tadzhikistanu).
In 1917, the Tajik portion of the
Fergana valley – “from Khodzhent to Konibodom, Asht and Isfara” – was included
in the Turkestan Republic, he writes, and then at the end of 1924, it became
part of Uzbekistan, something that meant that it was at risk of “repeating the
fate of Samarkand and Bukhara are remaining outside of Tajikistan.”
But the Tajik population in
Konibodom was anything but happy about this arrangement, and on February 8,
1925, they blocked the train of Soviet president Mikhail Kalinin and forced him
to agree to pay attention to their demands that their language be respected and
ultimately that they be included in Tajikistan rather than Uzbekistan.
Even before the Bolshevik
revolution, the Tajik-speaking people of Konibodom were noted for the knowledge
of languages and even their supplying of translators of the Russian mission in
Kashgar. There were numerous medrassahs and at least 2500 people involved in
religious instruction.
In January 1918, the city was
included within the Kokand district of the Fergana Oblast of the Turkestan
ASSR. That oblast was predominantly Uzbek speaking, and its leaders did little
to help the Tajik speakers, frequently keeping funds intended for them from
reaching their intended destination, according to the Tajiks.
The situation deteriorated after the
national territorial delimitation in 1924 when the Konibodom residents work up
to discover that they were included within Uzbekistan and that the government
insisted on the “’Uzbekization’” of the Tajiks. Almost immediately, the
situation boiled over.
On January 15, 1925, the city’s
residents sent a letter to Stalin demanding that they be included in Tajikistan
or at least that their language and cultural rights be respected. Nothing
happened, and when Kalinin came through their city on the way to a Bolshevik
party meeting, the Konibodom residents took their chance and blocked his train.
Confronted by this popular anger,
Kalinin had no choice but to agree to push what the city’s residents wanted,
and the results were not long in coming: Moscow instructed Uzbek officials to
recognize the linguistic and cultural rights of the Tajiks and ultimately
transferred the territory of the city to Tajikistan, thus in the minds of the
Tajiks saving it from Uzbekification.
Borders among the Soviet republics
were changed more than 200 times between the end of the Russian civil war and
the death of Brezhnev, typically to address the economic and political needs of
Moscow or republic leaders but only rarely in response to popular
demonstrations.
The transfer of Konibodom was one of
the rare cases in which it was popular activism that forced Moscow’s hand, and
judging by the comments appended to Mannonov’s article, many Tajiks are proud
of what their ancestors did and apparently view it as a model for how they
should act as well.
If indeed some of them act on that,
such demonstrations could exacerbate the situation not only in Tajik-speaking
regions of Uzbekistan but become a model for minorities in other post-Soviet
countries as well, one more way in which Putin’s talk about Moscow’s need to
protect Russian speakers abroad may have some consequences that he would not
want.
No comments:
Post a Comment