Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 17 – Russia is
making the same mistake with the former Soviet republics that the West is
making with Russia, according to the editors of “Nezavisimaya gazeta.” Like the
West, Russia is angry at some governments but is taking steps that harm the
population, costing it the trust of the population and its “zone of traditional
influence.”
In a lead article yesterday, the
paper says that this is happening apparently without the Russian authorities
noticing it, although the powers that be should be able to see how this is
happening in the case of Moldova, hitherto a country positively disposed to
Russia and Russians (ng.ru/editorial/2015-09-16/2_red.html).
“There was a time,” the editors say,
and not so long ago, “when Moldovans trusted Russian more than they did
‘fraternal Romania’ and the European Union.”
Five years ago, for example, polls found that “more than half of the
population considered the Russian Federation as [their country’s] chief
strategic partner,” far more than named the EU or Romania.
Moldovans’ trust in Vladimir Putin
at that time was truly striking: At a time when his rating in Russia itself
only slightly exceeded 40 percent, in Moldova, two-thirds of those surveyed
“considered him the best politician in the world,” the paper’s editors
continue.
This view of the Russian president
“had not changed even by the summer of 2014” when Chisinau had already signed
an EU association agreement and Moscow in response prohibited the importation
of Moldovan agricultural products into Russia.
The Moldovans expected the EU to buy up their surplus, but that didn’t
happened.
Russia could have but didn’t. Such a step would have been good for Russians
given the high quality of Moldovan agricultural products, and it would have
been good for Moscow given the sympathy such purchases would have generated
among the Moldovan population. But
instead, the Russian authorities made a situation already bad for them worse.
The Russian government agreed to
import foodstuffs from Gagauzia and Transdnestria, areas whose leaders are
traditionally pro-Moscow, but not to do so with regard to food produced
elsewhere in Moldova, whose population up to that point had been remarkably
positive in its assessment of Russians and Putin as well.
Such selectivity may make sense to
Russian agricultural officials, but it doesn’t more broadly given Russia’s own
needs and the state of Russian influence in Moldova, “Nezavisimaya gazeta”
says. “Moldova,” it points out, “is the
only country in the CIS besides Belarus where the majority of the population
despite everything continues to trust Russia and its president.”
One could say something similar
about the Georgians and their relations with Russia and Russians, the paper
continues. “Even in the most complicated
times when it appeared that nothing linked us together any more, ordinary
Georgians, while cursing the Russian government always related with warms to
ordinary ‘simple Russians.’”
That was true, the paper says,
“during the rose revolution and later when Sukhumi became Sukhum and Tskhinvali
Tskhinval.” But it isn’t true any longer: “Today Georgians are uprooting their
centuries-old vineyards because ‘Russians are refusing to buy our wine.’ But
we, ‘simple Russians,’ haven’t refused.”
Moscow’s focus exclusively on
governments rather than populations is costing it far more than it appears to
know and quite possibly creating situations where however successful the
Kremlin is in bringing this or that government to heel for the time being, it
is ensuring that in the future the populations of these countries and hence
their regimes won’t be positive about Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment