Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 20 – Seven residents
of the former Agin Buryat District say that they and other residents of that
former federal subject were lied to in the 2007 campaign to get them to agree
to be amalgamated into a common Transbaikal kray, that they want those behind
these lies to apologize, and that they want changes to protect their nation and
its culture.
In an open letter to the acting
governor of the kray, to the leadership of the ruling United Russia Party there,
and to all residents of the Agin Buryat District, the seven civic leaders say
that nothing has worked out as the backers of amalgamation said it would and
that their people are being destroyed (g.zbp.ru/ab/83/b9e828.bskayg.sw0i.pdf).
Consequently, they
say, they want and expect apologies from all concerned and changes, including
perhaps the reversal of the 2007 vote, lest their nation suffer any more. Their appeal has attracted widespread
attention in the Russian Far East. (See, infpol.ru/news/asia/117210-agintsy-nas-naglo-i-bessovestno-obmanuli/ and chita.ru/news/89242/.)
Three
aspects of this appeal make it of even broader importance: First, it is a rare
collective denunciation of one of the policies Vladimir Putin has made central
to his rule and that has clearly run into obstacles in recent years. This letter will only encourage others to
resist and make it more difficult for the Kremlin to combine additional federal
districts.
Second,
it calls attention to the growth of Buryat nationalism more generally, an
ideological trend that among other things seeks to unite all Buryat lands
inside the borders of the Russian Federation – including in the first instance
the two that were amalgamated earlier -- as well as expand ties with the
Republic of Mongolia.
And
third, this open letter given its addressees seeks to put pressure directly on the
United Russia party at a time when the votes of the Agin Buryat District may
again prove decisive as they did in earlier gubernatorial elections, possibly
forcing United Russia to make some concession in order to win votes and thus
again serving as a model for other regions.
Many
residents of the Agin Buryat District were skeptical about amalgamation, but
they were won over by a propaganda campaign that suggested they would be better
off and that they would always enjoy special status within the new larger kray.
Things haven’t worked out that way, the letter says.
On
the one hand, the situation in the district has deteriorated with each passing
year, forcing many of the Agin Buryats to leave for work elsewhere in the Far
East, including in Korea and China, and transforming a third of the region’s
population centers into ghost towns with little or no hope of recovery.
And
on the other, neither the kray government nor Moscow has provided the assistance
either promised; and the kray has not kept its promises to treat the district
as a truly special entity. Instead, the letter specifies, it has suffered along
with the kray population as a whole, not the way things were supposed to work.
This
letter did not come out of nowhere – for background on the Agin Buryat case,
see windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2016/05/amalgamation-talk-said-pushing-buryats.html,
windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2013/02/window-on-eurasia-anger-at-putins.html,
and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2015/11/backers-of-putins-amalgamation-of-two.html)
– but it is the most prominent and politically sophisticated move so far and
highlights the rise in tensions in the Transbaikal.
No comments:
Post a Comment