Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 23 – It has become
an article of faith that Vladimir Putin acted suddenly in annexing Ukraine’s
Crimea that many have ignored something that Leonid Grach, the former leader of
the Communist Party on the peninsula, knows well: Russia was actively preparing
the groundwork in Crimea for such actions six years before it pounced.
In an interview given to the Meduza
news agency, Grach, who headed the Crimean Supreme Soviet from 1998 to 2002
said that Moscow was involved in political and economic life in Crimea at least
as early as 2008 – just after Putin’s notorious Munich Security Conference
speech (meduza.io/feature/2017/03/21/esli-by-nas-ne-podderzhal-patrushev-v-krymu-stoyal-by-amerikanskiy-flot?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=share_fb&utm_campaign=share).
The former communist leader says that
while a Ukrainian peoples deputy, he never concealed his “pro-Russian attitudes”
and took “definite actions intended to promote the rapprochement of Crimea and
Russia … I openly professed pro-Russian sentiments. More than that, I realized them.”
“In particular,” he says, he and his
people seized NATO equipment that was put in Crimea for a NATO-Ukrainian
exercise in 2008 and did so on the orders of Nikolay Patrushev, then director
of Russia’s FSB and now the secretary of the Russian Security Council.
Patrushev understood clearly what was at stake in Crimea, Grach says.
Grach’s remarks are far from matters
of historical interest only. They are an indication that Moscow is playing a
long game and that it is putting in place in various parts of the former Soviet
space people and institutions that it can use if and when it chooses to subvert
or annex part of them.
On the one hand, of course, such
statements are intended to further poison political life in these countries and
thus promote precisely that outcome. But on the other, Grach’s words should
serve as a warning to all the countries in Russia’s neighborhood and those who
support of the real nature of the dangers they face given Putin’s intelligence
operative style of foreign policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment