Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 19 – Eight days ago,
US Secretary of State posed a rhetorical question to his G-7 counterparts, “Why
should US taxpayers be interested in Ukraine?” There are both compelling
reasons why they should be and even more why the real question is why US
citizens should be (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2017/04/american-citizens-should-care-about.html).
But when people, be they senior
officials or ordinary citizens, begin asking questions like that, it is a clear
indication that they are increasingly focusing on themselves rather than on broader
issues and are tired of bearing the burdens that the situation or their leaders
have demanded.
That makes a poll result from the
Russian Federation, the country which has invaded Ukraine, especially
interesting, because it suggests that Russian taxpayers are beginning to define
the Ukrainian issue in much the same way Secretary Tillerson has. That is, they
are asking why they should be interested in Ukraine if it is taking money away
from them.
According to the Levada Center, Russians
still view the Anschluss of Crimea positively and dismiss Western criticism of it
as a violation of international law. But it also found that 41 percent believe
that the Kremlin has cut spending on education, healthcare, wages and pensions
to finance the annexation, an indication of a softening of support for “Crimea
is Ours” (levada.ru/2017/04/18/15811/).
Even more significant,
the survey recorded that only 24 percent said that they believe that the
Russian authorities were acting correctly in sending money to Crimea at a time
when there are cutbacks on education, healthcare and other social needs in the
Russian Federation as well. And roughly a third said that the authorities had
made a mistake in doing so.
Obviously, given that Russia is a
dictatorship rather than a democracy, such popular attitudes are not going to
translate immediately into policy changes by the Kremlin. But they suggest that ever more Russians are
suffering from what might be called “Ukraine fatigue” and that that the Kremlin
to maintain its public standing may have to take that into consideration.
No comments:
Post a Comment