Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 28 – Even though
Ukrainian has a stronger historical claim to the Cyrillic alphabet than does
Russian and even though it captures Ukrainian sound values quite well, some
Ukrainians want to make the shift away from Cyrillic to a Latin script in order
to underscore the independence from Moscow and desire to integrate with the
West.
Not surprisingly, many Russians and
Russian speakers are horrified, viewing this as yet another Western plot to
peel off part of “the Russian world.” Some of them are predicting disasters
ahead, including the demise of an independent Ukrainian language if Kyiv were
to decide to shift to Latin.
But trapped in their own historical
mythology about Ukrainian being an offshoot of Russian rather than a language that
developed in parallel with it, some of these opponents are advancing arguments
which lead to exactly the opposite conclusion than the one they want Ukrainians
to make.
Talk about shifting Ukrainian from
Cyrillic to the Latin script, of course, has long been a feature of Ukrainian
life. But this year, support for that
idea appears to have grown as other post-Soviet states like Kazakhstan and
Kyrgyzstan have made the decision to make this transition.
In January, Kyiv journalist
Stanislav Rechinsky argued for the shift in order to break with Russia and
bring Ukraine closer to Europe and the West.
“The further from the Russian Federation we can become, the better,” he
said (lenta.ru/news/2017/01/25/perevod/).
Now, Na Chasi issued a manifesto
calling for that change (nachasi.com/ul/manifest/; for a Russian summary, see newsland.com/community/4489/content/opublikovan-proekt-latinskogo-alfavita-dlia-ukrainskogo-iazyka/5803623).
The
manifesto publishes a proposed alphabet and calls on journalists, writers and
others to join the initiative. It argues that such a shift will make it easier
for Ukrainians to learn English and Western languages and redirect their
attention away from Russia.
Reaction
from ethnic Russians and Russian speakers has not been long in coming. Most
repeat the arguments that others have made against Latinization projects
elsewhere in the former Soviet space (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2017/04/bolshevik-arguments-for-shifting.html
and windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2017/04/latin-script-making-inroads-even-in.html).
But
because Ukrainian has historically developed using the Cyrillic alphabet,
Russian arguments against a shift to Latin script have added two points. Both
are problematic, and the second is likely to lead Ukrainians to take exactly
the opposite action that Moscow and these Russians would like.
On
the one hand, Russian opponents of the introduction of the Latin script for
Ukrainian will separate Ukrainian away from Russian, undermine Ukrainian as an independent
language, and lead to “the accelerated Russification” of Ukraine (naspravdi.info/novosti/vvedenie-latinicy-na-ukraine-obernetsya-uskorennoy-rusifikaciey-strany).
That argument is based on the
mistaken belief, widespread among Russians and Western specialists on the
former Soviet space that Ukrainian like Belarusian is a byproduct of Russian
historical development and thus severing its ties with Russian would lead it to
wither and ultimately die out.
That is nonsense: Again like
Belarusian, Ukrainian developed as a separate language from Russian but was
constrained in that regard because it lacked statehood to promote that language
via schools and media and because most of these institutions were dominated by
the Russian language just as Ukraine and Belarus were dominated by Russia.
And on the other hand, Russian
opponents are putting forward an argument which any close examination shows
will blow up in his face. A half a millennium ago, this argument runs, Poles
and Russians spoke much the same language and didn’t need translators to
understand one another.
But then Poland introduced the Latin
script and as a result grew away from the Russian world, the opponents say, not
appearing to recognize that many Ukrainians would not object to being as
independent from Moscow as Poland now is. Indeed, at least some of them will
see this Russian objection as the best argument for Latinization on offer.
No comments:
Post a Comment