Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 4 – In explaining why
the new Russian Guard plans to restore the red banner and the name Feliks
Dzerzhinsky in its operations, Col. General Sergey Melikov told Izvestiya that such moves were entirely
appropriate because veterans have asked for this and because his organization
is “the heir of the NKVD.”
Those words were included in the
original article but then taken down when someone recognized the dangers of
drawing a direct link between an organization that repressed millions of
Russians and Putin’s new Guard. However, those who took them down from the
webpage forgot that in the age of Screenshot, nothing is really ever lost
forever.
The original Izvestiya article is at iz.ru/news/719276;
the Screenshot of the passages that were removed is available at scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/18814050_10154800594723525_4241670326627761488_n.jpg?oh=40fb296d2f2c247b6c2c9cb68fa117eb&oe=59AC1104).
In
reporting this incident, Snob portal commentator Ivan Davydov says that words
like these matter, however much some may devalue them in their efforts to hide
what they are really about (snob.ru/selected/entry/125281). And he then offers what is certainly
the most succinct and accurate definition of national unity under Putin now
available.
In Putin’s Russia, he writes, “the
unity of the nation is when one and the same people scurry to churches built in
memory of those innocents who were killed and then write on their banners the name
of the executioner who killed those innocents.” This sends a horrific signal
about the direction in which Russia is now moving.
Individual Russians can privately
believe what they like, but when the state sends such signals, society should
respond with horror, Davydov says, because “people must understand that out of
this ‘continuity’ and ‘unity of the nation grows the chance” that the horrors
of the past can return.
No comments:
Post a Comment