Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 29 – Russian opposition
candidates are winning support in places neither the Kremlin nor Moscow’s
analysts expected: the numerous regions across the Russian Federation that the
central government has neglected, according to a report by Germany’s Handelsblatt.
In an article entitled “The Russian
Provinces Rise Against Putin,” the German business paper says in many places,
local people are supporting Aleksey Navalny because of Moscow’s neglect (handelsblatt.com/politik/international/russland-die-provinz-probt-den-aufstand-gegen-putin/20238408.html;
in Russian inopressa.ru/article/28Aug2017/handelsblatt/russia_oppozit_01.html).
A journalist from
the paper visited Vyksa, a town of 60,000 in Nizhny Novgorod oblast about 300
kilometers east of Moscow. What it found
were many local businessmen who are concerned that the Kremlin’s “aggressive
foreign policy” is hurting their business and who are thus prepared to support
Navalny against Putin despite all odds.
One of them has seen his business
collapse since 2014 and blames Kremlin policies for that. He earlier served on the city council where
he learned that Moscow takes all the money and decides everything. The
businessman says that he now believes the country must decentralize if the
economy is to grow again.
And he is doing more than
complaining. Not only are he and some like-minded people distributing Navalny
literature despite the opposition of the authorities, but they are using
YouTube to produce Vyksa Live, a one-hour weekly program that reaches from
500,000 to a million people.
That broadcast talks almost exclusively
about local problems and the need for local solutions, and officials have been
forced to respond to its reportage, fixing some if not all of the problems the
broadcast points to.
Obviously, supporting opposition
figures is not career enhancing, the people of Vyksa say; but now at least
businessmen fear that if they don’t support an alternative to the current
regime, they will be left with nothing: “In 1991, all of us were equal and had
nothing to lose,” one says. “But now I do have something to lose” – and thus
something to defend.
No comments:
Post a Comment