Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 16 – By denial
and indirection, Moscow has tried to suggest that American forces are to blame
for the deaths of Russian mercenaries in Syria; but in reality, “responsibility
for what happened rests on the closest effective powers – the Russian command,”
and their actions raise the old question: “was this stupidity or treason?”
In a comment on the Kasparov portal
(kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5A85D2EEE903F),
the Moscow analyst offers a five-part argument in support of his overall
conclusion:
·
First,
no one disputes that there were at least some casualties among the irregular
Russian forces or that they were there with the approval of both the Syrian
authorities and the Russian military command in Syria.
·
Second,
those who suffered were mercenaries under the terms of international law.
·
Third,
“responsibility for all their actions is in the hands of the closest effective
powers – the Russian command,” something the Russian defense ministry has
indirectly confirmed by asserting that the mercenaries had acted “without the
agreement” with Russian commanders, an indication that from Moscow’s point of
view, they should have done so.
·
Fourth,
“these mercenaries attacked citizens (military personnel) of the US, despite
repeated warnings by the US representatives” against such actions. “The organizers
certainly knew that they were beginning a direct military confrontation with
the US [and] that the US would quickly discover” that those doing so were
connected with Moscow.
·
And
fifth, once the American response began, the Russian command “for several
hours” did nothing to tell the Americans that they were attacking the wrong
people although they had done so in the past and although once the Russians
made such a call in this case, the Americans ceased their operation.
No comments:
Post a Comment