Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 3 – The Duma
deputy who earlier drafted the law imposing life sentences on anyone convicted
of recruiting terrorists is now in the final stage of preparing one that would
establish separate Guantanamo-style prisons in Russia so that extremist
radicals would not be able to recruit other inmates to their cause.
Adalbi Shkhagoshev, a member of the
Duma security committee from Kabardino-Balkaria, says that such an arrangement
is necessary because there are between 2,000 and 4,000 Islamists in Russian
penal institutions alongside other prisoners convicted of ordinary crimes whom
they often recruit into radical cells (svpressa.ru/society/article/192047/).
In Russian prisons, it is impossible
to restrict such contacts, the deputy says; “and therefore we propose to create
one or two prisons specially for those convicted of violating anti-terrorist
laws.” Doing so would bring Russia into line with what other countries are
doing, including the US with its Guantanamo prison.
According to Shkhagoshev, ten to
fifteen percent of prisoners who are confined with radicals become members of
their groups after they finish their sentences.
A decade ago, that wasn’t so serious because there were only a few
hundred extremists behind bars; but now there are thousands. The problem has
grown, with many now talking about “‘prison jamaats.’”
Not everyone thinks this is a good
idea. Pavel Chikov of the Agora Human Rights Organization says that such
arrangements could be made without changing the law but that given Russia’s
size, having only two such special prisons will be a problem because Russian
law requires that prisoners live near their homes, something that reduces
recidivism.
There is another and even larger
problem, he suggests. There are all kinds of people convicted of extremist
crimes in Russia. How will penal authorities manage a situation in which there
are simultaneously groups of Islamist radicals and neo-fascist nationalists,
neither of whom has much use for the other.
Another expert also has doubts.
Dmitry Agranovsky, a Russian attorney, says that the whole idea is “an
absolutely unwise proposal” in that it violates existing law because it treats
those convicted of this set of crimes in a fundamentally different way than
those convicted of others and is thus discriminatory.
Moreover, the proposal ignores that
the penal authorities have experience in keeping certain groups apart, such as
former policemen and criminals they may have put behind bars, Agranovsky says.
They can address the problem agitating Shkhagoshev without adopting a new law.
And, he asks, why does the Duma deputy
think that the American experience with Guantanamo is worth copying? After all,
it has been “condemned by almost everyone, including Russia. We should we make
use of the worst models of the West world? We don’t need to stand in one dock
with these Americans.”
No comments:
Post a Comment