Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 17 – Many people are
looking at the tough language that London and other Western capitals have used
to denounce Moscow for its attempt to kill Sergey Skripal and his daughter in
the UK and concluding that Vladimir Putin has suffered a major defeat. But in fact, Kseniya Kirillova says, Putin
came out a winner given what he hoped to achieve.
On the one hand, neither London nor
the other Western capitals have imposed new penalties corresponding to their
tough new language. Indeed, expelling only 23 diplomats is hardly a major
penalty; and it is one Moscow can easily match without suffering real problems,
the US-based Russian analyst says (slavicsac.com/2018/03/17/kremlin-skripal-poisoning/).
And on the other, in deciding on who
won and who lost in this situation, one has to consider the reasons Moscow took
its initial action and those which animated the West. If one does that, Kirillov suggests, it is clear
that Putin came out a winner in the Skripal case, something that makes it more
likely he will engage in similar crimes in the future.
“The majority of experts,” the
analyst says, “are inclined to the version that the main goal of the attack on
Skripal was to send a message to other potential defectors, not only from among
the officers of the special services but also officials, oligarchs and all
those who are informed about the Kremlin’s dirty deeds.”
These include in particular,
Kirillova continues, those listed in Washington’s “Kremlin Report” but not yet
sanctioned and who may want to work out a deal, those with information of
interest to the Mueller investigation in the United States, and others like
Oleg Deripaska who have offended the Kremlin by their actions.
Those who do so domestically the Kremlin finds
it easy to send a message that “it is better to lose your business than to lose
your life,” the analyst says. But those living abroad present a different but
as the Litvinenko and Skripal cases show far from irresolvable challenge – and they
are generally carefully prepared lest things go other than the leadership
intends.
That certainly seems to be the case
with Skripal, Kirillova says. On the very day he was attacked, Moscow’s REN TV
already had a story prepared about the utility of doing away with those whom
foreign intelligence services may recruit (ren.tv/novosti/2018-03-04/med-knut-i-pryanik-kak-agenty-zarubezhnyh-specsluzhb-verbuyut-chinovnikov).
And Russian blogger Nikita Tomilin
provided additional evidence that the Kremlin had prepared this attack not just
to remove Skripal but as a PR effort to send a message to others (facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10212940391922765&set=a.10200351992860656.1073741825.1179858334&type=3&theater).
Since the attack on Skripal in the
United Kingdom, Russian media and Russian officials have used the word “message”
a lot in their discussions about the case, an indication that that is exactly
what the Kremlin had in mind. And to be
honest, Putin from his point of view won more than he lost.
He succeeded in stirring up
nationalist passions at home in advance of the elections, and he succeeded as
well in keeping the British response “diplomatic” and moderate. Yes, London
expelled 23 Russian “diplomats,” but that is a loss Putin can easily make up
for and respond to in kind without much criticism at home or abroad.
As US-based Russian historian Yury
Felshtinsky has said repeatedly, Moscow in general and Putin in particular
believe that the West will complain a lot when there is an attack but do very
little. As a result, Kirillova suggests,
there is no reason to believe that Putin won’t carry out more such attacks in the
future.
No comments:
Post a Comment