Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 26 – Growing inequality
among Russian citizens has attracted a great deal of attention in that country
and elsewhere; but another form of inequality – that among the country’s region
– has not been the focus of nearly as much. But now that may change, Anton
Feinberg suggests.
According to a new World Bank study,
a copy of which the RBC journalist now has, “Russia today has the highest level
of [regional] inequality among major countries with developing economies such
as Brazil, china and India.” It has fallen somewhat in recent decades but
remains extremely high (rbc.ru/economics/26/09/2018/5baa58cd9a7947f649eea8fa).
“Households
in Sakhalin Oblast which has the highest GDP per capita in the country have a standard
of living analogous to that in Singapore while households in Ingushetia which
has the lowest ranking on this status have a standard of living close to that
which is observed in Honduras,” the World Bank says.
In
the wealthiest regions of Russia, fewer than 10 percent of the population are
poor, while in the poorest regions of the North Caucasus, Siberia and the Far
East, “almost 40 percent” are below the poverty line. At the same time, personal inequality is
greatest in the rich regions and lowest in the poorest ones where a far larger
share consists of the poor.
Some
might think that this pattern is explained by urbanization. But World Bank
experts suggest otherwise. Rather it
follows regional lines, with poor regions generally having poor cities and wealthier
ones wealthier cities, Feinberg summarizes the findings of the bank’s research.
Natalya
Trunova, a specialist on regional development at the Moscow Center for
Strategic Processes, says that these figures are an inheritance from the Soviet-imposed
administrative-territorial division of the country which have magnified
differences between rich and poor regions.
“Many
countries have encountered this problem,” she continues. “for example, Poland
where there was practically the same problem at the start of the 1990s
conducted a major administrative-territorial reform,” reducing the number of
units from 49 to 16 and reducing regional imbalances as well.
Russia
has not done so, and as a result, at present, the ten wealthiest regions
produce more than half (52.1 percent) of the country’s GDP, with the city of
Moscow alone generating 20 percent. At the same time, Trutneva says, “we have
small regions with a small industrial base which will always have to be subsidized.”
No comments:
Post a Comment