Paul Goble
Staunton,
September 28 – A new study of the September 9 elections concludes that protest
voting among Russians against United Russia in them resembles to a striking
degree the protest voting of Soviet citizens against representatives of the
nomenklatura in the first free elections in the USSR in 1989 and 1990.
The
study, prepared by the Liberal Mission Foundation, is available at liberal.ru/articles/7274. It is
summarized and discussed by Rosbalt commentator Aleksandr Zhelenin at rosbalt.ru/russia/2018/09/28/1735397.html
who stresses this comparison between Russian behavior now and Soviet behavior
nearly 30 years ago.
According to the study, Zhelenin
says, “the results of regional and local elections which took place at the beginning
of September demonstrate “the presence in society of a demand for the fundamental
renewal of political elites and the organs of power,’” something crystallized
by Russian opposition to the government’s pension reform plan.
Neither Vladimir Putin who “softened”
the reform nor United Russia whose candidates “tried to distance themselves”
from it succeeded in stemming Russian anger and preventing protest voting or
even more opposition expressed by staying away from the polls altogether, the
study continues.
Instead, Russians turned not only to
other systemic opposition parties but also to “spoilers or obvious outsiders”
to express their rage if they went to the polls at all, while “the majority of
voters as typically happens in regional and municipal polls ‘voted with their
feet’ and did not take part in the elections.
Only in four of the 22 regions where
voting took place did participation rise above 50 percent, and in the rest, it
was far lower. In Krasnoyarsk Kray, for
example, it was under 30 percent. And in
Moscow where strong opposition candidates had been excluded by the powers that
be, it was only 30.9 percent.
Unlike in the last election,
representatives of the party of power found their way to victory more difficult
and, in some cases, blocked altogether, as Russians cast protest votes and as
the United Russia-backed officials failed to mobilize their own supporters to
the extent that they had earlier.
Zhelenin points to one intriguing
observation in the report: Its authors say that “many voters,” angry at the powers
that be, have “begun to vote even for ‘obviously weak and unprepared for office’
candidates, something that demonstrates they were voting against United Russia
and Moscow rather than for someone else.
No comments:
Post a Comment