Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 22 – Villagers in Arkhangelsk
Oblast and the Komi Republic have denounced a plan by Moscow officials to use
their area as a dump for trash from the capital as an act of genocide and
demanded that the city “keep its trash to itself” rather than spread it around
the country to places which don’t generate so much waste.
At a meeting the regional officials
gave permission for, the villagers said that what Moscow calls “a priority plan”
will contaminate the land and waterways of their region and represents nothing
less than another outside invasion of the kind they fought off during the
Russian Civil War and World War II (belsat.eu/ru/news/moskva-hrani-svoj-musor-u-sebya-protestuyushhie-obvinili-vlasti-v-genotside/).
And one
participant in the protest said that the protests must continue until the plan
to bury trash around their villages is stopped. “It would be ideal if we had a
meeting like the one in Ingushetia” and continue until we are able to “carry
out a referendum on the territory of the Lena region with our own forces and
without the participation of the powers that be.”
“For
the entire history of Russia, not one leader of a region has included the disposal
of trash of others in a swampy area as a priority plan,” Lyudmila Marina, a district
deputy says. “We don’t need any
investment projects [which is what the center is offering] in exchange for the
destruction of an entire region.”
Ivan
Ivanov, a local ecological activist, says that in his view the only reason regional
and local officials have gone along is that they have received enormous amounts
of money from Moscow, a kind of bribe in exchange for the death of the region,
with others saying that officials had hoped to hide what they and Moscow were
doing until it was too late to stop them.
NIMBYism
is not a rare thing either in Russian regions or even in the neighborhoods of
Moscow. Residents routinely object to the plans of the authorities by saying “not
in my back yard.” But the protest in Arkhangelsk
is noteworthy not only because of the level of anger – few denounce Moscow for
genocide – but for the fact that it referred to Ingushetia.
The
former suggests that even in predominantly Russian regions anger about the overreaching
of the Moscow authorities is growing; and the latter that despite Moscow’s
efforts to ignore what has been happening in the North Caucasus, even villagers
in the Far North have heard about it and are following the example of the
Ingush protesters.
No comments:
Post a Comment