Paul Goble
Staunton,
November 21 – The Russian commentariat ever more frequently features
apocalyptic predictions about the rapidly approaching end of Russia, with some
like MGIMO professor Valery Solovey suggesting that the situation in Russia
today is very much like that in the Soviet Union in 1990-1991 and that the
results will be similar.
But
two Moscow bloggers, A.Nalgin and Ivan Lapin argue there are three fundamental
differences between 1990-1991 and today as far as Russia is concerned that make
such prophecies extremely doubtful if not excluded altogether even if the
country is suffering real and serious problems (publizist.ru/blogs/4796/28055/-
and a-nalgin.livejournal.com/1607894.html).
“First,” they
write, “in present-day Russia there is neither a real opposition, systemic or
extra-systemic nor even a bureaucratic fronde.”
Thirty years ago, there was “an alternative leader” in the person of
Boris Yeltsin who enjoyed enormous support in the population and in the
bureaucracy, including that of the CPSU. There is no one equivalent now.
“Second, in the Russian Federation
today, regional separatism both at the official and popular level is tightly
controlled. The artificially unleased in
the media Chechen-Ingush conflict is more like an everyday argument than
something which recalls the separation of the Baltic which legally was formed
in March 1990.”
Moreover, the two write, “there is
nothing similar to the itner-ethnic fire in Karabakh and so on.” What is
perhaps most striking is that “the region which was the most separatist in the
1990s – Chechnya – is today Moscow’s best friend.”
And “third, the attitudes of
present-day Russians and Soviet citizens then are very strongly distinguished
one from the other.” Soviet citizens really had come to conclude that they
couldn’t continue to live as they had been, but while “doom and apathy with a
touch of anger” dominates Russian feelings now, almost all are afraid of
another 1991.
That fear “outweighs everything,”
they write, and means that the apocalyptic predictions of some like Solovey
should be dismissed at least for now. “The Russian kettle” may continue to “simmer”
for some time, but the temperature will have to go up considerably before
anyone should be talking about the end of Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment