Paul Goble
Staunton,
January 24 – Retired Lt. Gen. Nikolay Leonov, who was deputy chief of the KBG’s
First Chief Directorate, says that during the Cold War, Moscow routinely used
Mexico as the site for meetings with its agents in the US because the Mexican
counter-intelligence service was much less effective than the American FBI.
In
the course of a wide-ranging interview with Igor Latunsky of the Versiya portal, Leonov made several
statements confirm much of what specialists on the Soviet KGB gave long known
or assumed as well as some clearly intended to continue disinformation about
Moscow’s activities (versia.ru/general-kgb-o-shpionax-podgotovke-gosperevorotov-i-o-cene-predatelstva).
First of all, he
says, “one must acknowledge that the work of the KGB was conducted in Mexico
especially actively, including in part holding meetings with agents recruited
on the territory of the US. This as less dangerous because the Mexican
counter-intelligence service worked less effectively than the FBI.”
Second, the
retired KGB general says that Moscow believed that the Cold War would be won or
lost in the Third World, a place where the USSR had advantages as far as
ideology and military assistance were concerned but was in a losing position
economically. Thus, the Soviets often controlled the ports through which
American goods passed.
Third, Leonov, who was a specialist
on Latin America, says that the Soviets were rapidly gaining ground in that
region before the USSR ceased to exist. But with the passing of the Soviet
Union, he continues, that opportunity has passed as well.
Fourth, he reports that “the best
agents” for Moscow were those who volunteered out of ideological sympathies but
suggests that they were often driven by economic difficulties at home and the
possibility that Moscow could help them overcome those difficulties with
infusions of cash. Money alone was not the best motivator.
And fifth, the former KGB senior
officer says, the US intelligence service maintained ties with criminal groups
but the KGB was “strictly forbidden from doing so.” Forbidden, it may have
been, but Moscow often viewed those others saw as criminal as something else,
so such cooperation was frequent, Leonov’s claim to the contrary.
No comments:
Post a Comment