Staunton,
February 17 – Moscow’s recent moves against religious groups, the editors of Nezavisimaya gazeta say, mean that the
West may again define the country centered on Moscow as “an evil empire,” a
term introduced by Ronald Reagan that the paper says had more to do with
religion than with ethnicity (ng.ru/editorial/2019-02-17/2_7510_red.html).
As a matter of history, that reading
is not without its problems: The US president talked about the nations living
under Soviet control and was an enthusiastic supporter of the Captive Nations
Week resolution. But the parallels between
the 1980s and now that the Moscow paper draws are important for two
reasons.
On the one hand, it reflects a trend
among Russian writers to treat ethnicity as a less important factor in the past
and present than religion and to view what happened at the end of Soviet times
as the result of religious divides more than just between ethnic ones. This
notion is also not without problems, as ethnicity and religion are far from coterminous.
And on the other – and this is far
and away the more important – Nezavisimaya
gazeta is quite correct to point out that Reagan frequently directed his
talk about the Soviet Union as “the evil empire” at American evangelicals, “having
in mind,” the paper’s editors say, “the struggle of the communists with
religion.”
Evangelical groups were among the
most enthusiastic supporters of this idea and helped keep it alive until it
became a mainstream notion – although to be accurate, Reagan’s real contribution
to the struggle was to call the USSR an “evil” empire, something that allowed
his liberal opponents to drop the evil but nonetheless retain the empire idea.
What the paper doesn’t say at least
on this occasion is this: if evangelical Christians conclude the current
Russian policies against religion make the Russian Federation the evil empire
of today, they could become the basis for a tectonic shift in American opinion
about Russia toward greater concern not only with religious rights but with
ethnic ones as well.
And that is especially likely
because the evangelical Christians in the US are the most reliable part of the base
of Donald Trump, the most pro-Russian US president in history. If the current incumbent
of the White House concludes that his base has turned on Russia, he is quite likely
judging from his other policy shifts to follow them.
That could further intensify
negative American attitudes about Russia and make it more rather than less
likely that those attitudes will continue both in the population and in the
political elite far longer into the future than anyone in Moscow expects, yet
another way in which the Kremlin’s domestic policies are backfiring
abroad.
No comments:
Post a Comment