Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 31 – By a more than
two-to-one vote, a Riga conference of Open Russia, a movement started in 2016
by Mikhail Khodorkovsky and that the Russian authorities have declared “undesirable,”
has voted to disband the current group in order to protect its activists from
official persecution.
At the same time, some members of the
group have sought to register with the authorities possibly under a new name
but without the links to Open Russia in the United Kingdom that Moscow objects
to, a combination of actions that has left others uncertain about what comes
next (interfax.ru/russia/656375
and ng.ru/politics/2019-03-31/1_7544_registration.html).
Khodorkovsky himself suggested that
the organization could either choose to enter into direct conflict with the
authorities like some radical groups have or seek a compromise. He and others
stressed that the path the group has chosen is intended to protect activists
and does not constitute recognition by them of the legitimacy of what the
Moscow authorities have done.
While one can only respect that
decision and the motivations behind it, this represents an extremely troubling
development because it may serve as a model for future shut downs of groups the
Kremlin doesn’t like, treating their members so badly that the group will
decide to liquidate itself rather than have officials take that step.
In that event, of course, Moscow
propagandists can be counted on to claim that the authorities didn’t shutter
the groups but rather the activists themselves made that choice. Unfortunately,
that argument will be accepted uncritically by many both within Russia and
beyond even though it is superficially plausible but in fact entirely wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment