Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 30 – Vladimir Putin
thought he could count on the Russian Orthodox Church to legitimate his increasingly
reactionary and authoritarian regime, Igor Eidman says; but the Church has
alienated so many Russians by its arrogance and greed that the Kremlin leader
has to turn to a new legitimating principle, the quasi-religious cult of
victory.
The Russian sociologist argues that
the ROC MP has been able to show “extensive” growth by building more churches
but it has not shown “qualitative growth” in attracting more believers. Instead,
the church has driven ever more away and cost the Kremlin support in the process
(openmedia.io/exclusive/pochemu-xramov-vse-bolshe-a-doveriya-k-cerkvi-vse-menshe).
Russians were never as religious as
Putin imagined, although they identified as Orthodox as a kind of ethnic marker
and were quite prepared to defer to it until the ROC MP began to use its
involvement with the regime to push obscurantist measures and its undoubted influence
to take land away from the people for pompous churches.
As a result of this, over the past several
years and especially over the last few months, the standing of the church with
the people and consequently with the regime, albeit with a certain lag, has
collapsed with the church falling far down the list of respected institutions
and the Kremlin not getting the benefits it hoped for.
Indeed, the only place where the ROC
MP has been successful, Eidman says, is rapidly becoming yet another reason for
its downfall. Its acquisition of enormous wealth and the flashy lifestyles of
its hierarchs, something Russians had overlooked, are now a source not just of snide
comments but active hostility.
Such attitudes have intensified now
that church leaders have tried to seize public spaces, destroy green zones, and
even occupy museums and observatories. Yekaterinburg is a symbol of this but it
is also a turning point for the Church and for the Kremlin, weakening both and
forcing the latter to look for a new ideological base.
“The powers that be, seeing that the
church is insufficiently influential in society is turning toward other
instruments of ideological control over it. Recently, it has placed a bet on
the active promotion of a patriotic quasi-religious ideology, the chief element
of which is ‘the cult of victory.’” This cult has more active participants than
the Church.
As a result of this turn, Eidman
concludes, “the main religious symbols of Putinist Russia are not the Christian
cross or an icon but the neo-pagan six-pointed star with images of ancestor
warriors and ‘sacred’ Georgian ribbons, symbolizing military victories. The role
of the ROC in the sphere of ideological servicing of the powers is becoming secondary.”
As a result, the church remains “a
business and nothing more.” How much of that the powers that be will allow in the
future remains to be seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment