Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 17 – When any society
looks back on events of a century, it often fastens not on what have long been
assumed to be the most important individuals but rather on marginal figures whose
actions and personalities compel attention not only by their out of the ordinary
characteristics but also their resonance real or imputed with current events.
Perhaps the most notable such figure
as Russians look back to the Civil War period was Baron Max Roman Fyodorovich
von Ungern-Sternberg, the Baltic German baron who was distinguished by cruelty seldom
matched in human history, seized Mongolia from the Chinese with only a thousand
men, and has passed into legend after being executed by the Bolsheviks.
Unlike other such figures at the
margins of the great struggle between the Reds and the Whites, Ungern has always
attracted the interest of both Russians and non-Russians, but that interest
appears now to be peaking in Russia – and Aleksey Mikhalyev, a political scientist
at Buryat State University has investigated why this is so and what it may
mean.
In “The God of War or Memory about
the Black Baron in Present-Day Russia” (in Russian; Politicheskaya nauka
3 (2018): 129-146 (inion.ru/publishing/journals/politicheskaia-nauka/arkhiv/2018-3/bog-voiny-ili-pamiat-o-chernom-barone-v-pravom-diskurse-sovremennoi-rossii/; summarized by
Olga Sobolevskaya at iq.hse.ru/news/286418877.html), he presents his
conclusions.
“Dauria gothic is a neo-romantic
trend in art characterized by a dark atmosphere and mythologized subjects about
wars and conflicts in the Trans-Baikal,” Mikhalyev says. (Dauria on the border between
Russia and China was Ungern’s headquarters and torture chamber until he marched
with his Asiatic Cavalry Division into Mongolia.)
This isolated region has long been
filled with mythologies about lamas, Buddhism, yogas, the search for the
Shambala and the like, but with Ungern, who sprang from an impoverished branch of
the Baltic German nobility, this traditional “Asian gothic” was combined with
elements of the European, including many things resembling Dracula.
“Dauria gothic,” the scholar continues,
has been pushed in novels, histories, mange comics, anime and even rock music,
all of which combine horror and mysticism, the living dead, ghosts, fortune
tellers, shape shifters and all the other phenomena of the gothic in Western
Europe.
All this is presented as believable,
Mikhalyev suggests, because it occurs in a far away play “beyond the limits of the
everyday” and because at the center of it all is real historical figure people
can focus on, Baron Ungern-Sternberg about whom people can look up in the
history books.
“Instead of the Holy Graal and other symbols
of nobility, there are ‘the doors of the Shambala.’ And the ‘Dauria feudal’
Ungern too is a hybrid of Western and Eastern forms: a crusader knight and a
Buddhist, a local ‘king’ – and ‘a white khan.’”
Legends about Ungern began to be created
shortly after his death, most prominently by a Polish fantast named Ferdinand
Ossendowski whose book Beasts, Men and Gods was a best seller in the West. It
purported to be true – Ossendowski knew Ungern in Urga – but was almost
entirely made up.
(That was obvious to people who
really knew what happened at the time. Sven Hedin, the great Swedish explorer,
wrote a pamphlet about him entitled Ossendowski and the Truth: Two Strangers.
Other commentators like Dmitry Pershin with direct experience were even more
brutal.).
Also important at the birth of the
Ungern legend was Arseny Nesmelov, a Russian émigré in Harbin who wrote “The
Ballad about the Dauria Baron” in 1928, an epic poem in which all gothic
elements were present and in which the baron himself was presented “almost like
a horseman of the Apocalypse.”
Most White Russian leaders were
horrified by Ungern believing him to have brought dishonor on their cause, and the
Bolsheviks of course were only too happy to present him in the darkest tones,
something that unintentionally attracted attention. See the 1948 novel Dauria
by Konstantin Sedykh and the 1971 Soviet film of the same title directed by
Viktor Tregubovich.
Ungern also attracted
the attention of the Nazis who characterized him as “the ideal Aryan” and even “the
first fascist.” There is even a legend that Alfred Rozenberg, the Nazi
ideologue, wrote a play about Ungern that played in German theaters in the
1930s, another story that for some has done nothing to distract attention from
Ungern.
At the end of the Soviet period and the
beginning of the Russian one, both Russian historians and Western ones sought
to wade through the mythology; but Mikhalyev says that even the best of them
were profoundly affected by what they sought to dispel. (See academia.edu/7730735/Кузьмин_С.Л._2011._История_барона_Унгерна_опыт_реконструкции._М._КМК_).
The baron’s legend has continued to grow
and metasticize, with various political trends “from nationalists to
monarchists” finding their own Ungerns. Grand Duke Vladimir Kirillovich, the
father of the pretender to the Russian throne, even called Ungern the equal of
philosophers Petr Savitsky and Lev Karsavin!
Mikhalyev says that “by the level of
mythologization, the personality of Ungern is comparable only with the figure
of Chapayev.”
“Of all the leaders of the White Movement,”
Mikhalyev says, “Baron von Ungern-Sternberg became a significant figure not
only in Russia and Germany of the 1930s and 1940s but also in Mongolia.” That
has continued: Ungern’s visage now appears on football shirts and on fake
Buddhist icons.
The Buryat historian says that the
main reason for this is that Ungern in his mythologized form represents “a
certain ‘revolt against the contemporary world,” one in which the Middle Ages
are viewed as organic and good and the modern age as artificial and
defective. That is why there is so much
talk about the black baron, the god of war, and so on.
As Mikhalyev documents, the number
of books, nominally history, openly novelistic, and even cartoons, has risen since
the end of Soviet times. Each offers its reader a vision of Ungern designed to
fit what that individual wants. Given how many disputes there are about the
Dauria gothic world, that is easy – and very likely to continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment