Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 15 – In the wake
of the self-immolation of Udmurtia’s Albert Razin to protest the murder of his
language and ultimately his nation, ever more people, Russians and
non-Russians, are talking about the consequences of Vladimir Putin’s decision
to make the study of the titular languages of the non-Russian republics
voluntary for everyone on their territories.
Many Russians find assertions by
non-Russians that “the voluntary study of national languages is in fact forced
Russification,” school director Rustam Kurbanov says in a blog post. They think
that if children and their parents have a choice, then it must be entirely
voluntary, but that is only how it appears on the surface (echo.msk.ru/blog/rustam_kurbatov/2499543-echo).
If one examines
the situation more closely, the educator continues, it quickly becomes apparent
that what many think is a voluntary situation is in reality something
else. Before Putin’s decision, all
pupils in the non-Russian republics had to study both Russian and the language
of the titular nationality two or three hours a week.
But a year ago, the non-Russian
language classes became electives. What
has this led to? Russian children
stopped taking them and studied other subjects that would help them to do
better in the school examinations. But
soon thereafter, non-Russian children did the same given that the examinations
are given only in Russian.
“There is nothing voluntary about
this at all: Russian as the state language remains absolutely obligatory as by
the way is English. What is voluntary is
only the study of the state languages of the autonomous republics.” And that is
leading to the dying out of those languages “not naturally as a result of
competition” but “forcibly” as a result of state policy.
“Russia is a federation,” Kurbanov
continues, “and each republic in it has the right to its state language, the
pushing out of which is a violation of the federal principle with bad consequences.”
What is needed, he argues, is not
sacrificing Russian to non-Russian but rather the promotion of bilingualism:
“the majority of people speak two languages. That is more the norm than the
exception.” There is nothing wrong with having Russian pupils “living in
Udmurtia or Chuvash, studying the languages of these peoples on or two hours a
week.”
After all, the Udmurts and Chuvash
are studying Russian as a requirement – and they speak Russian too.
No comments:
Post a Comment