Paul Goble
Staunton, June 22 – The coronavirus
pandemic has hit the North Caucasus particularly hard, the result of both
inadequate health care and cultural attitudes that have prevented many from
taking proper precautions or seeking help early on when it could have been the
most effective.
But it has also been the result of
the inadequate response of many local leaders who haven’t wanted to call
attention to problems in their fiefdoms and of the sense being expressed by
some in Kabardino-Balkaria that “we are far from Moscow: who needs us?” (meduza.io/feature/2020/06/22/my-zhe-daleko-ot-moskvy-komu-my-nuzhny).
Many of these social and political
aspects of the pandemic in that region were discussed on a May 31 online
conference among experts, whose deliberations have now been reported by Naima
Neflyasheva in her North Caucasus Through the Centuries blog on Kavkaz-Uzel (kavkaz-uzel.eu/blogs/1927/posts/43793).
Ziyautdin Uvaysov, head of the Patient
Monitor project, says that one of the most unfortunate aspects of the pandemic
in the region has been that a large number of doctors have become infected and
then have spread the virus to others even as they try to combat it, largely
because of inadequate defensive mechanisms.
Almost all doctors recognize this is
the case, he continues, but instead of speaking out and demanding change, the
doctors have remained silent – and the pandemic has become much worse in the
North Caucasus. Many of them have remained silent because they fear that if
they speak out, they will be fired and not able to find other work, other participants
add.
Rustam Pezhev, a TV journalist from
KBR, says that no medical system could possibly have been prepared for the
onslaught but that the one in the North Caucasus was especially inadequate.
Moscow has not provided enough help to build up its response and as a result
the hospitals in the region have gone deeply into debt in the hopes of doing their
jobs.
He and other speaks said that what
is needed is a new doctors’ union that could bring to the attention of the powers
locally and in Moscow of the problems they face and mobilize the population to
demand more and better treatment, although all who advocated such a union said
its prospects for success are not great.
Pezhev was among those who said that
the pandemic had expanded so rapidly not just because of shortcomings in the
medical system but because of popular attitudes. Many people there have denied the
coronavirus exists or taken the view that it is the result of some conspiracy
against Russia.
Moreover, he continues, “the
mentality in the Caucasus does not allow people to express fear, worry or agitation;
and thus thing slike self-isolation, the wearing of masks and antiseptics are
viewed as a form of ‘cowardice.’” Because people won’t follow these strategies,
more of them are getting sick.
Aida Kasimova, an attorney from
Daghestan, suggests that a major factor is that people in the North Caucasus
live in large families and are accustomed to interacting with them. That means
if one member becomes infected, others are likely to. She too says that in her
republic “the majority doesn’t believe in the virus.”
But Khasan Nalgiyev, a member of
Daghestan’s Social Chamber, says that the pandemic has brought out one very
positive aspect of North Caucasus culture: charitable organizations have
flourished or even been started from scratch as people try to find ways to help
their neighbors cope.
No comments:
Post a Comment