Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 26 – The Duma plans
to discuss a new law setting November 11, the anniversary of the defeat of the
Mongol Horde at the Ugra River a public memorial day. Plans to do so have been backed
by a 100,000-signature petition and are already sufficiently advanced that
regional governments are preparing for the day (golosislama.com/news.php?id=36895).
Anatoly Artamanov, the Kaluga
governor who is an enthusiastic proponent of the idea, says that the defeat of
Khan Akhmat by the forces of Ivan III of Moscow in October-November 1480 is
generally viewed by Russian historians as the end of the Mongol Horde’s
dominance over Russian lands.
“At present,” he says, “the Duma is
considering a draft law about establishing an all-Russian memorial day to
coincide with the anniversary of the end of the Great Stand on the Ugra.” He says
he is confidence this will be adopted at the start of the legislature’s fall
term given how much support it has in the regions.
The text of the bill has already
been approved by the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Russian State Archive,
the ministries of culture, defense, justice and the Institute for Legislation
and Comparative Law in the Russian government.
Russians began pushing for this
holiday in April 2017, but many people pointed out that the battle was less
conclusive that Moscow is accustomed to think and that people from the same
ethnic communities were on opposite sides of the fight, thus making any
commemoration potentially explosive.
Rafael Khakimov, director of the
Kazan Institute of History, says that while Russian historians earlier accepted
that the Ugra battle was “the date of the liberation of Rus from
‘the
Mongol yoke,’ now these views have been revised.” In fact, no battle at that
time took place on the Ugra River.
“The events of 1480 were only an
episode in the struggle for supremacy in the Horde and not an act of liberation
of Moscow from the power of the Tatars. From a scientific-historical point of
view, the stand at the Ugra River must not be considered as an especially
significant historical event linked to the liberation of Rus from the power
of the Horde.”
But there is a bigger question,
Khakimov says, and that is this: “why in general should residents of the multi-national
Russian Federation in our time regardless of region mark a medieval date connected
with the freeing of a single pro-Russian ruler from vassal dependence on
another?”
What is going on with this proposal,
the Kazan historian says, is an effort to force the Tatars and other peoples of
Russia to “mark the victory of a Russian Orthodox prince over Muslim Turks,”
something that is consistent with Putin’s approach but not conducive to good
relations among the nations of the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment