Paul Goble
Staunton, Dec. 16 – Just as was the
case before 1991 when some in the West suggested that the disintegration of the
USSR would lead to “a Yugoslavia with nukes,” so now again many in the West now
openly express the view that the strategic defeat of Russia and the coming
apart of Moscow’s empire is more dangerous than the Kremlin is now, Kamil Sagaev
says.
The League of Free Nations activist
who was trained in China and Great Britain notes that while most observers agree
that “Russia has been a threat for centuries,” they continue to insist that “her
defeat is ‘unacceptable’” and argue that “Russia must not lose or new state
will take its place and could start wars with each other” (region.expert/west-afraid/).
Driven by the belief that the world
will have to continue to contend with “a single aggressive empire” or “the
possibility of chaos” from the appearance of new states, the West is “taking
the side of the empire” and “offered the people of Russia the role of ‘hostages
for rent’” whose “freedom would be dangerous to the convenience” of the West.
It is both reasonable and logical to
ask, Sagaev says, “how is such thinking different from Russian imperial
doctrine? The answer is an unpleasant one: “In no way” because “it is the same
fear of the freedom of peoples just under a different flag,” even though those
in the West promoting this notion are themselves the result of the demise of
empires.
And this question leads to another
one that no one wants to have posed: “why did you [in the West] yourselves
descendants of collapsed empires, appoint the peoples of Russia the role of
eternal subjects?”
“If Russia inevitably collapses
economically in the coming years, what are you going to do? Pour money into her
until the end? Frozen reserves to give away? Issue new loans from European
banks to prolong the life of a dying empire?” the League of Free Nations
activist asks rhetorically.
And
he points out that “this is not politics anymore. This is fear elevated to the rank of doctrine. Freedom
cannot be canceled by external fear” because “empire always fall. History knows
no exceptions but every time before a breakup, there is someone who demands
that its people wait because ‘this is not the time.’”
But
of course, Sagayev says, “the time is always the same: the time of freedom
comes when people stop asking for permission.”