Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 25 – Now that
Vladimir Putin is focused on Syria and clearly unlikely to stop there, the
Ukrainian government should take advantage of the situation by moving militarily
to reclaim Russian-occupied territories in the Donbas and Crimea, according to
Konstantin Borovoy.
“The attention of the Russian
president has been distracted” for the moment by Syria, the Russian commentator
says. “But he needs instability in Ukraine, that is his only goal, [and] for
Putin the situation now is ideal: no one is trying to change anything, people
are negotiating with him as if he were a real politician, and he feels himself someone
who is making the decisions.”
No one else is particularly
interested in helping Ukraine because “it doesn’t require anything and doesn’t
want anything,” Borovoy argues. From the point of view of the international
community, everything can continue unchanged for some time to come (gordonua.com/news/politics/Borovoy-S-tochki-zreniya-mezhdunarodnogo-soobshchestva-okkupirovannye-Krym-i-Donbass-Ukrainu-vpolne-ustraivayut-103282.html).
And that means, he continues, that
Crimea and the Donbas will remain under occupation.” Indeed, “the situation will
change only been Ukraine will begin to resist.”
The refugee crisis has driven
Ukraine down to a second or third level in Europe, and there can be “no doubt”
that Putin has exploited and accelerated the refugee flow even if it did begin
before his bombing. “This is one of the means of creating instability in Europe
– the technology of provocation and the technology of the special services.”
“I do not think,” Borovoy says, “this
is the last provocation.”
Given that, one must “defend oneself”
and not wait until something happens, he continues. “Inaction is very dangerous and even criminal”
for European and Ukrainian politicians.
“Today, in spite of itself, Ukraine
is fulfilling yet another indirect function: it is taking part in the defense
of the international community against aggressive Russia. Putin will not stop
at Syria. Provocations against Israel (and it is said this project is already
working) and agains thte Baltic countries are possible.”
In that situation, Ukraine has a
responsibility not just to silently sit by and wait for the occupation to
somehow end. Some in Ukraine understand that.
Among them are the Crimean Tatars. It is reasonable for Kyiv to be cautious,
but it is dangerous when caution “becomes cowardice” or even the appearance of
cowardice.
Russian citizens and voters, Borovoy
argues, “are already tired of the military operation in the Donbas and in
Ukraine itself. This propaganda serial has ceased to be interesting to viewers.
Therefore, according to all the laws of mass media, an interval has been
declared, but this does not mean that the theme is closed for Putin.”
Rather it means, Borovoy says, that
Ukraine has an opportunity to being the liberation of the Donbas and Crimea by
military means, military because there are no other realistic ones. If Ukraine doesn’t do something, “no one, no
Merkel and no Hollande will try for a solution;” and neither will Obama.
Doing nothing as new in fact works
to Putin’s benefit: it adds to instability and undermines the trust of Ukrainian
citizens in their government. The decision of the Crimean Tatars to blockade
Crimea shows that “citizens themselves are beginning to address government
problems.”
And that means, Borovoy says, that “the
next question which they will ask themselves is this: why do we need such a set
of powers if we have to solve state problems ourselves?”
At present, many Ukrainians are saying
and some even believe that Russia will eventually give up the occupied
territories, but that is a mistake, Borovoy says. When things deteriorate even
more, Putin will be even more ready to use military action to deflect criticism
from himself.
And there is one other factor and a
terribly important one that people in Kyiv need to keep in mind: “in Crimea and
in the east of Ukraine are citizens who believe their country and president
will at some point liberate them.” The longer time goes on, he implies, the
fewer such people there will be.
No comments:
Post a Comment