Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 19 – Just how
alienated Khabarovsk residents feel from Moscow and how much the Russian system
has changed was underlined when Yury Trutnyev, Vladimir Putin’s plenipotentiary
for the Russian Far East, felt compelled to tell people in Khabarovsk that “I’m
not from Moscow; I only work there. I’m from Perm which is very similar to
Khabarovsk Kray.”
This is the latest but hardly the
worst mistake Trutnyev has made, Ruslan Gorevoy, a commentator for the Versiya
portal says. Not only has he continued to live in Moscow rather than in his
federal district, but he has insulted Khabarovsk residents by shifting the FD
capital t Vladivostok and renting 3.5 million hectares to the Chinese (versia.ru/xabarovskie-protesty-poslednij-shans-nesistemnoj-oppozicii-rastashhit-stranu-po-chastyam).
As a result, Gorevoy continues, it
is important to see the Khabarovsk protests for what they are: an attack on
Trutnyev even more than an attack on Moscow and an effort by the liberal
opposition to weaken and dismantle Russia before the new constitutional
amendments make it absolutely impossible for anyone to even talk about
separatism.
The Versiya commentator points out
that he has been warning about Moscow’s “insane policy” under Trutnyev for
almost two years (versia.ru/bezdumnaya-politika-moskvy-v-regionax-mozhet-privesti-k-pechalnym-posledstviyam), a policy that has left the region
increasingly impoverished and thus fertile ground for those who want to promote
separatism.
He
cites a variety of observers to support his point, but their words suggest the
problems of the Far East won’t be cured by the removal of Trutnyev, something
Gorevoy clearly seeks, because they reflect more profound shortcomings in the
center’s relationship with Russia east of the Urals.
Anatoly
Nesmiyan, who blogs under the screen name El Myurid, says that “in essence what
is happening in Khabarovsk Kray now is a purely anti-colonial struggle;” and he
reminds that “an anti-colonial struggle inevitably transforms itself into a
national-liberation movement with the next stage being the freeing of the colonies
and the establishment of nation states.”
People
in the region even have a precedent, the Far Eastern Republic, “an independent
state with its own flag, coat of arms and even ruble,” he continues. (On echoes
of that history today, see windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2020/07/protesters-in-khabarovsk-now-talking.html.)
Gorevoy
also cites the words of Dmitry Sokolov-Mitrich, a Moscow liberal, who points
out that if anyone doesn’t know, people in the Far East “don’t love Moscow.” And
when people there speak about “the West,” they have in mind not what Russian
television talk shows do but rather “everything to the west of the Urals.”
No comments:
Post a Comment