Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 5 – The term, “third
world countries,” arose in the Cold War to designate those states between the
first world of the capitalist West and the second world of socialism. That concept is now out of date because the
division has broken down and because many third world countries have climbed
out of poverty, Yuliya Latynina says.
But the idea of a fourth world remains
important as a category including countries llike Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba,
North Korea, Sudan, the Congo, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, and Haiti
and as a description of what Moscow is now trying to achieve, she continues (novayagazeta.ru/articles/2017/12/04/74791-strany-chetvertogo-mira).
Fourth world countries, she says,
are characterized by the following features: “the main source of money for the
ruling elite is money from outside” or from monopolies shared among themselves,
the rest of the population doesn’t have access to external resources or the
earnings the elite takes for itself, and the rulers blame the impoverishment of
the people on external evils.
“It isn’t difficult to see that the
path along which Russia is moving is precisely that of the countries of the
fourth world. If in the times of the USSR, we tried to catch up and surpass
America, now [it has become clear that the goal the ruling elite is pursuing is
to catch up and surpass “the Palestinian autonomy.”
The chief economic underpinning of
this pursuit, Latynina says, is “the impoverishment
of the population” (her emphasis). That might seem surprising to some
because for most of human history, rulers have striven to improve the lot of
their peoples so that their peoples will not be tempted to revolt.
But the world has
changed, and the old rules no longer apply. “In today’s post-industrial global
economy, the rules are different.” That is because in many countries, there is “an
excess of population which it is quite easy to feed and dress” and because the source
of wealth for the elite comes “not from taxes but from raw materials, state
enterprises and monopolies.”
“In such a situation,” Latynina
says, “the rulers of the countries of the fourth world become interested not in
improving the standard of living but in impoverishing the population and thus
increasing its dependence on the rulers.”
An impoverished population is simply easier to control and rule: it has
no choice but to turn to the rulers.
That is exactly what has been
happening in Russia, she argues. “In
recent years, the authorities have destroyed the banking system of Russia and
without credit there is no market in today’s world. At the same time, the state
banks willingly offer credits to companies close to the rulers” but don’t give
money to the population.
People must understand, Latynina
continues, “that all these measures are far from accidental.” They are intended
to make the population poorer and thus more dependent, because a poor and
dependent people will deify those who do this to them rather than revolt
against them as one might expect.
“Why is Sicily poor?” she asks “Because
there is a mafia in it, and what is the attitude of the average Sicilian to a
mafia don? He deifies him. The don is a subject of worship, envy and love. Only
he gives the poor Sicilian money for a wedding” and so on. That is the mechanism of the fourth world –
and the mechanism that exists in Russia today.
At first glance, that might seem
absurd given that Russia’s rulers constantly talk about their concern for
economic growth and blame any shortcomings on outsiders. “But this isn’t so,”
Latynina says. Rather after the protests of 2011-2012, it became clear in the
Kremlin that office workers and the middle class couldn’t be the reliable base
for the regime.”
That regime needed “a poor majority”
because only it could support a regime that increasingly turned to “state
obscurantism” and rule as did Robert Mugabe. “In this sense, she says, “the
impoverishment of the Russian population is a strategic necessity for the
present-day powers.”
And over the course of the next
decade or two, she concludes, it will be determined whether “Russia will become
a country of the fourth world forever” or whether its people will succeed in
overthrowing a regime that is trying to transform their country into a Haiti or
a Zimbabwe.
No comments:
Post a Comment