Paul Goble
Staunton, Oct. 26 – Many Russians
and some non-Russians argue that numerically small peoples like the Sakha
should not pursue independence because it will prove a poisoned chalice with
one kind of oppression replacing another, but that is not necessary as the Baltic
drive to recover independence shows, Aleksandr Ivanov says.
The former Sakha Il Tumen regional
parliamentarian who was stripped of his position after being declared “a
foreign agent” says that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania show a different and
better way forward (themoscowtimes.com/2026/10/26/dictatorship-isnt-destiny-for-russias-indigenous-peoples-they-can-build-independent-democracies-a94088).
“The three Baltic states started in
1991 with the same Soviet legacy” as the people of Sakha, Ivanov says, “a
devastated economy, Russification, nomenklatura officials and an absence of
market institutions. Over 30 years, they became democracies and members of the
European Union and NATO.”
Estonia had few people “with almost
no natural resources” but quickly “build one of the world’s most digital states
… gave the world Skype … and what in what is particularly important” to him, the
Sakha politician says, “restored its language’s status as the state language
after decades of russification, precisely what we are fighting for today.”
“We in Sakha have a vast territory and
enormous mineral wealth: the republic produces most of Russia’s diamonds, as
well as gold, coal, gas and rare earth metals.” Now, “imagine Estonian
institutions — transparent government, high-quality education and digital
governance — combined with the resources that now flow to Moscow.”
“Of
course,” Ivanov continues, “resources alone guarantee nothing. They can be used
for good or for harm. That is precisely why we need to learn from those who
have managed to build a strong, free and educated society without gas or
diamonds. [And]We have much to learn from Estonia and its Baltic neighbors.”
“We
can no longer trust new agreements with the colonial power sitting in Moscow.
Every time the beast grew weak, it persuaded us to stay and promised to treat
us well. Every time, it deceived us. It is time to break free of our Stockholm
syndrome and look with clear eyes.”
And
he concludes with optimism: “My people — like the Tatars, Bashkirs, Buryats,
Altaians, Erzya and others — are ready to live of their own free will and
develop their independent, multiethnic republics themselves, free of Moscow’s
chauvinism, xenophobia and imperialism.”