Paul Goble
Staunton, June 4 – Only 34 percent of Russia’s federal highways and only four The m over them, Artyom Kiryanov says. As a result, Russia has to spend enormous sums repairing them each year and cannot build the new highways it needs.
If Russia were to shift to using concrete rather than asphalt as countries like China and the US have done, it would not need to repair its roads as often and they would survive longer, the deputy chairman of the Duma economics committee says (octagon.media/ekonomika/betonnyj_argument.html).
At present, Kiryanov continues, only two percent of Russian highways and only 0.08 percent of all roads are concrete, something that requires they be repaired every year or two and would increase the period between major overhauls from a few years to as many as 12 to 15.
The advantages of concrete roads have already been recognized by other advanced countries: Cement covers 45.8 percent of the length of roads in the US, 47.2 percent of those in China, and 10 to 40 percent in European countries. They thus spend less on repairing existing roads and more on building new ones.
Some Russian officials remain trapped in the past, convinced that the weather in Russia and the damage done to road surfaces by winter tires make a change impossible. But they are wrong: others are building concrete roads in even worse climates and concrete has now been developed to withstand even winter tire damage.
The main problem lies elsewhere, Kiryanov says. “There is no legally enshrined mechanism for mandatory comparison of rigid and non-rigid pavement options that requires the calculation of full life cycle costs at the design stage.” Were one introduced, Moscow would recognize how much it could benefit from a shift to concrete.