Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 7 – Despite Kremlin
actions like the Navalny poisoning, Western governments have largely limited
themselves to tough public statements rather than serious actions, the
reflection of a combination of circumstances that Western officials are
generally unwilling to recognize, Liliya Shevtsova says.
First of all, the Russian
commentator points out, liberal democracies don’t like to take tough action if
they can avoid it, especially when they fear, as many of them do in the Russian
case, that tough action could lead either to a Kremlin response they don’t want
or a Russian collapse that neither wants (newsru.com/blog/07sep2020/navalny_zapad.html).
Second, Shevtsova says, “the Russian
rulikng class has formed within the West a defensive barrier in the form of a
stratum which serves its needs.” Gerhard Shroeder is the archetype, but Russian
involvement in banking and real estate is so great in many Western countries that
any move against Moscow could backfire on the countries that take it.
And third, many in the West remain
convinced that while it may be possible to work something out with Russia and
get it to change, both face a bigger and more frightening threat in the form of
China which Western governments simultaneously fear and see little or no chance
of changing.
This combination of factors, more
than the specifics or any given situation, explain why Western governments respond
to what Moscow does. What is even worse: the Kremlin fully understands this and
knows that if one of these factors doesn’t work with one country, the other two
are available, and when more than one country is involved, some or all of them
are in play.
No comments:
Post a Comment