Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 18 – In exchange
for constant expressions of the loyalty, the Kremlin has made unprecedented
concessions to Chechnya and it leader Ramzan Kadyrov that have allowed the
latter to establish what is a “de facto Islamic state with clear signs of an
eastern despotism,” according to a leading Russian analyst.
In many ways, Igor Rotar writes in a
post on Rosbalt.ru yesterday, “the Kremlin’s relations with Chechnya are very
similar to the actions of tsarist Russia in one of its protectorates – the Emirate
of Bukhara,” whose leader was allowed to do what he wanted within that
territory but had to show loyalty to Imperial Russia (rosbalt.ru/blogs/2013/09/17/1176805.html).
But
there are increasing indications that this model is breaking down because
Kadyrov is “consciously seeking to broaden the influence of Chechnya on other
subjects of the Russian Federation” because he would like to spread his model
of “’an Islamic subject in a secular state’” to other republics and regions.
Kadyrov’s
interest in that regard is suggested by his backing of Chechen groups elsewhere
in Russia, his promotion of the Grozny mosque as a symbol of the Russian
Federation, and most recently by his decision to erect a monument to Chechens
who fought and died in the struggle against the Russian Empire in the 19th
century.
According
to Rotar, all of those reflect deeper patterns both within the Chechen nation
and in Moscow’s policies toward the Chechen Republic, policies associated with
President Vladimir Putin that “until recently” and despite the criticism of
human rights activists “seemed to many to be the only correct choice.”
The Moscow analyst notes that “a
particular feature of the psychology of the Chechens is that in the event of an
external intervention, they will forgetting their internal differences unite
against him,” at the level of street fighting or even at the level of a war
between Chechnya and the Russian Federation.
The first and second post-Soviet
Chechen wars demonstrated this clearly, and Moscow resolved to address this
problem by playing up internal divisions among the Chechens on religious
grounds as a way of reducing more immediate political tensions between the
Chechens and the Russians.
However, the Kadyrovs, father and
son, while the perfect Chechens to implement such a policy shift nevertheless
have exploited it to build their own power and promote their own Islamic vision
of society and state.
Some may see this problem as
something dreamed up, Rotar continues, “but for many believing Chechens, the
defense” of what is for them traditional Islam against Wahhabist radicalism is “a
holy responsibility,” leading to a clash characteristic of many Islamic
countries such as Syria.
This “religious schism in Chechnya
has been very useful for the Kremlin, because many Chechens do not want to
fight their co-ethnics, and the number of militants has fallen sharply,” Rotar
says. But that success has come at a
price: the Islamization, albeit in a traditional ways, of Chechen society far
beyond what it ever was before.
In Grozny, today, the Russian expert
notes, “one can see posters showing two girls: one in a hijab in front of a
mosque, and the other with uncovered hair in front of an abyss. The orthodox
Muslim turns to the apostate: ‘I’m a Chechen and proud of this. I support the
traditions of the nation. Who are you? Your clothes profane the image of a
Chechen woman.”
And it is not just a matter of
posters. Women who work for the Chechen government must wear the hijab as must
girls in schools. Alcohol is sold only from eight to ten in the mornings. And “in
essence, a ‘morals police’ is operating de facto in Chechnya,” a Kadyrov group
that ensures women wear hijabs and men don’t wear long hair.
Moscow may not be entirely happy
with what its policies have led to, Rotar suggests, but at the same time, the
Russian government does not want to get in an argument with Kadyrov: the
Chechen leader right now has “a much better supplied and organized army than
the one that Dzhokhar Dudayev, the first leader of the Chechen separatists,
had.”
No comments:
Post a Comment