Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 2 – Moscow should
consider the problems that overly ambitious expansion has brought to both the
European Union and NATO and not seek fall victim to the notion that it must
expand the Eurasian Union as quickly and as far as possible, according to
Aleksandr Krylov, a leading Russian specialist on the Caucasus.
In the course of a discussion of the
Karabakh problem, Krylov was asked for his reaction to Russian efforts to
broaden its sphere of influence by integrating various countries into the
Eurasian Union, a process that involves more than just countering the further
eastward expansion of NATO (arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=10145BA0-0054-11E4-8DB30EB7C0D21663).
Most Russian
commentators and officials are pushing for the expansion of the Eurasian Union
as far and a fast as possible to block the growth of Western influence and to
set the stage for political integration of the post-Soviet states, but Krylov
argues that Moscow should proceed slowly and cautiously in this regard.
NATO’s eastern expansion does “contradict
the security interests of Russia,” he acknowledges. “This influences Russian policy but in this
case, the main issue is not that.” Policy makers should keep in mind that the
re-ordering of the post-Soviet space and the processes this involves are “far
from over.”
“Unfortunately,
a united Europe did not emerge after the disintegration of the USSR. Instead,
there are two integration projects” in the post-Soviet space just as there are
numerous other integration processes in other parts of the world which are
giving rise to “the formation of a new multi-polar” system.
Which
of these will prove successful and which will fail are things which “only the
future will show,” Krylov says. And that concerns both the European Union and
the Eurasian Economic Union as well, both of which face challenges some of
their own making and some because of the activities of others.
Russia
is interested in securing “stable and successful development on the post-Soviet
space jointly with other states. But this contradicts the interests of those
forces which continue to live with the illusions of a unipolar world and seek
to block cooperation both at the all-European level and in the framework of the
Eurasian Economic Union project.”
“The
experience of the European Union shows,” Krylov says, “that its expansion has
given risen to many problems. It would
be useful for Russia to take this experience into account and to act on the
basis of the principle ‘better less but better’ and not to pursue the maximum
broadening” of the new organization.
Moscow
and its neighbors will only benefit from this, the Moscow analyst continues. “If
the founding member states of the Eurasian Economic Union obtain real benefits
from the project, if it becomes a success and guarantees stable development and
the resolution of social-economic problems, then the organization will hardly
be likely to face a shortage of applicants.”
On
the one hand, Krylov’s words may be nothing more than making a virtue out of a
necessity: relatively few of the post-Soviet states have shown much interest in
joining Moscow’s latest venture. But on
the other, his suggestion that Moscow should beware of the problems of overly
ambitious expansion suggests some in the Russian capital want to slow things
down.
No comments:
Post a Comment