Staunton, April 10 – It is a measure
of how Moscow has tightened the screws on the media that Russia will “soon
become a country in which there will be more blocked websites than working
ones,” according to Svetlana Kuzevanova, a legal specialist at the Voronezh
Center for the Defense of Media Rights.
In an interview to the “Svobodnyye
novosti-Volga” news agency, Kuzevanova said that the situation has already
reached the point where Moscow has declared her Center to be “a foreign agent,”
apparently because the Russian justice ministry thinks that defending the rights
of journalists in court is itself “political activity” (fn-volga.ru/article/view/id/250).
But what is especially worrisome,
she continued, is that officials are openly ignoring even existing laws about
the Internet and NGOs for political or other purposes, refusing for example to
close down child pornography sites as the law requires but shuttering
politically unwelcome ones instantly.
Kuzevana began her interview with a
discussion of the ways in which officials are using the epithet “foreign agent”
to restrict entirely legal activities.
All sensible people understand, she said, that for ordinary Russians,
the title “foreign agent” means that an individual or group is “an absolute
enemy of the state.”
Thus, saying the term doesn’t mean
anything is delusional: it was chosen by the powers that be for a purpose. If
Moscow simply wanted to require NGOs receiving grants from abroad to declare that
fact, it could have used a different term, possibly “’an NGO with foreign
financing’ or something else. There are very many terms in Russian.”
The fact that the regime selected
precisely this term, Kuzevanova says, shows that they had “an absolutely clear
goal: they understand that organizations which would be included in this registry
would not want to work under this name” and would “all the time be forced to
explain that we are not bad but good.”
The label is bad enough, but it is
accompanied by reporting requirements and fines that make it worse. Moreover,
and this is something many do not yet recognize the implications of, all NGOs
classified as foreign agents must label their products as produced by a foreign
agent, something that in many cases undercuts the possibilities for useful
work.
Kuzevanova pointed out that
organizations like hers which works to defend journalists in court are hardly
likely to get much support from the Russian government which has little
interest in such defense and thus must rely on grants from others, including
from foreign sources. If those sources
are closed down, so too will be the Center’s ability to fulfill its mission.
The legal specialist then turned to
the issue of internet freedom in Russia, something increasingly under threat
because the Russian authorities do not understand the medium and increasingly
ignore what laws there are. That leads them to conclude that the easiest thing
for them to do is to block sites they don’t like.
It also explains, she says, why officials
sometimes go after administrators, sometimes after site owners, and sometimes
after users. They simply don’t know what they should do. “For there to be
quality legislation, there must be quality understanding of terminology and the
essential features of the processes involved.
But that does not exist.”
And its absence means that in Russia
today, there is “an insane number of laws about blocking” websites rather than
taking any other action. “It seems to me,” Kuzevanova says, “that soon we will
become a country in which blocked sites will be more numerous than those which
are working.”
Increasingly, she says, Russian
lawyers are throwing up their hands because there are so many rules that can be
used to block sites, even though “blocking is the death of the resource now.
Procedures for blocking are written in the law, but they don’t work” because
they are applied selectively and politically instead of in terms of the laws’
intent.
Thus, the sites of “Yezhednevny
zhurnal,” Grani.ru and Kasparov.ru have been blocked, and appeals from their
operators have been ignored. But one of Kuzevanova’s colleagues has been
working to try to close a child pornography file sharing site, but officials
have ignored his calls to shutter it. As a result, “the site works and
continues to disseminate its horrific ‘content.’”
No comments:
Post a Comment