Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 3 – Many trace
the origins of Vladimir Putin’s conviction that the West will ultimately come
to accept whatever he does arose not as many think from its reaction to his
invasion of Georgia in 2008 but rather from the way it responded – or in fact,
failed to respond – to his violations of norms at the time of the Sochi
Olympiad, Yevgeny Titov says.
Titov, who covered the Winter
Olympics there in 2014 for “Novaya gazeta”, says Russia “constantly violated
human rights” in the run-up to the competition in its drive to use that event
for “imperial” purposes by “recalling Soviet achievements, returning to
Russians a sense of being a great nation, and raising Russia’s authority in the
international arena” (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=589440D0ABC44).
“In short,” he says, “the Olympics
marked the beginning of [Russia’s] getting off its knees.”
As is the case with “any imperial
project, the fate of an individual or of a 100 people or even a 1,000 didn’t
upset anyone. Bulldozers destroyed homes, magistrates sent residents away, and
bureaucrats under the wing of the state stole billions in their machinations
concerning property,” Titov continues.
In this and many other ways, “the
principles laid down in Olympic rules” were “violated in the crudest possible
way.” Western journalists “sometimes”
reported on these things, “but the reaction of the West was quite weak.” Its
politicians “closed their eyes to the numerous violations” and thus “give Putin
complete freedom of action.”
“When environmental activist Yevgeny
Vistishko was arrested (and then jailed), people demanded explanations but when
they got them, they acted as if they believed” what Moscow was telling them
because “no one wanted to spoil the party.” And that pattern, Russian action and
Western action opened the way for Russia’s aggression in Crimea and the
Donbass.
“The process begun by Putin in Sochi
automatically crossed the Russian borders [because] an empire is a system, and
a complex system never dies right away without making efforts to restore
itself,” the “Novaya gazeta” journalist says.
The West had an obligation to
complain and make demands and to declare a boycott if Russia continued to
violate the rules. “But instead they kindly and in a tolerant way forgave
Putin.” He learned a lesson from that;
it isn’t clear that the West has.
No comments:
Post a Comment