Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 31 – Nothing,
including democratization, threatens the territorial integrity of Belarus; but
many things, including any moves toward greater democracy, would lead to the
disintegration of the Russian Federation, according to Dmitry Luchikhin, a Russian
commentator who writes frequently for Kontinent.
That distinction between the two
countries is one of the most important factors limiting the spread of activism
like that on view in Belarus today to the Russian Federation, Luchikhin argues
(newizv.ru/comment/dmitriy-luchihin/01-09-2020/pochemu-rossiya-ne-belorussiya-i-komu-ugrozhaet-raspad-strany).
“The population of Belarus, like to
a significant degree that of other former republics, doesn’t feel a threat to
its identity from internal political processes,” he says. Their peoples are
confident that their country will remain in existence regardless of what
political changes occur. Belarus will remain Belarus, but Russians have no such
confidence about their own country.
That means, Luchikhin suggests, that
all parts of the political spectrum in these countries can take part in
politics without the fear that such participation will lead to disaster. But “the
situation in Russia is unfortunately different.” Many are certain, on the basis
of the experience of 1991, that any liberalization and democratization will
lead to Russia flying apart.
Such things, far too many Russians
believe, are “incompatible with the idea of the unity of the country.” For them to support a campaign for human
rights and basic laws would require that they first “overcome their attachment
to the values of the unity of the country with which they themselves identify
and allow the possibility of the disintegration of the country.”
That is why, Luchikhin concludes,
that “the total dissemination and reproduction of Belarusian protest5s in
Russia at the present time is impossible, although that in no way excludes or
makes meaningless local protest phenomena like that in Khabarovsk or protests
regarding the environment.”
Those are possible, even likely. But
a nationwide one would require a national self-confidence in the stability of the
country and its borders that Russians in large numbers don’t have and that the Kremlin
is all too happy to exacerbate for its own purposes to promote acceptance of the
way things are now.
No comments:
Post a Comment