Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 1 – The Greater
Urals Association, which in the early 1990s was associated with Eduard Rossel
and the creation of a Urals Republic, has disbanded and been dropped from the
organization and tax records the Russian government maintains. As such, one of the
once most important regionalist groupings has disappeared from the scene.
The end was not unexpected: the
Greater Urals Association had been largely inactive in recent years; but it was
at one time what many believed would be a harbinger of change in ethnically
Russian areas and even promote genuine federalism in the Russian Federation or
contribute to the disintegration of the country (ura.news/news/1052447765).
In reporting this development, the
URA news agency notes that “the Greater Urals Association was established more
than 27 years ago, on March 24, 1993, with its headquarters in Yekaterinburg.
Eduard Rossel at that time was attracted to the idea of creating a Urals
Republic would secure the financial and administrative independence” of the
region.
“Later,” the news agency reports, “the
regions used this structure for the discussion of economic cooperation. Besides
the Central Urals, the group included Udmurtia, Perm Kray, Bashkortostan,
Komi-Permyak District, and Orenburg, Chelyabinsk, and Kurgan Oblasts. The last
left the group in 2016.”
URA continues: “the liquidation
process began on September 16, 2014. Before that, the organization was led by
Eduard Rossel, but in the last six years, the head of the association was the
chairman of the liquidation commission, Vladimir Volkov.” That process has now
been completed.
On the one hand, the passing of the
Greater Urals Association which once seemed so promising to many can only be a
subject of regret as a measure of the extent to which Vladimir Putin’s power
vertical has eliminated the possibility for groups organized as that one was by
the heads of various federal subjects.
But on the other, its passing only
means that the new regionalism is based less on state structures than on
networks connecting people and organizations below the very top of the state
structures, networks that, as the response to the Khabarovsk protests shows,
may be even stronger than the more narrowly state-focused organizations of 25
years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment