Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 8 – Today on the
26th anniversary of the Beloveshchaya accords that effectively ended
the Soviet Union and at a time when Vladimir Putin is moving against the languages
of the national minorities of the Russian Federation, it is useful to recall
the role that Soviet attacks on non-Russian languages played in hastening the
end of the USSR.
That is what the CentrAsia portal
has done today by reposting a recent article by Russian commentator Nikolay
Syromyatnikov which appeared earlier this year on the Russian7 site (centrasia.ru/news.php?st=1512683580;
the original article can be found at russian7.ru/post/yazykovye-volneniya-1978-goda-chem-byli-ne/).
The Russian commentator points out
that “many historians call the Georgian ‘language’ risings of 1978 the first
serious foretaste of the disintegration of the USSR” because Moscow’s attack on
the Georgian language in favor of Russian had the effect of giving “victory” in
one Soviet republic to the nationalists, something that quickly inspired
others.
Indeed, Syromyatnikov continues,
this was the political spark that ultimately led to the parade of sovereignties
of 1988-1991 which had as its result the removal of “the Soviet Union from the
map of the world.” Given what Moscow is doing in Tatarstan and other republics
now, that represents a not-so-implicit warning to the Kremlin now.
Here is how it all began, the
commentator says. Georgia’s Russian-language newspaper Zarya Vostoka published the draft of a new constitution of the Georgian
SSR which spoke about the primacy of Russian and only then mentioned “the
equality of other languages used by the Georgian population.”
This was not only ambiguous in its meaning
thus allowing for multiple interpretations but also a major change from the Georgian
constitution then in effect which declared Georgian the state language of the republic
and did not mention any particular “’concern’ about the Russian language.”
After the draft appeared, the Tbilisi
intelligentsia became agitated; but instead of explaining the real meaning of
the draft and that it would not mark the end of Georgian as the dominant
language in the republic, the media and the authorities remained silent,
clearly expecting the population to simply accept what they had done.
Similar changes had been made in the
constitutions of all the other Soviet republics, but nowhere else did people
object so strenuously with thousands taking to the streets to demand a
revision. It is of course true,
Syromyatnikov says, that the 1977 Soviet constitution promoted “the
intensification of Russification of the USSR” and thus denigrated the
non-Russians.
Georgians had long been unhappy with the
reduction in the number of Georgian schools and hours of Georgian instruction
in them, but the draft constitution in the views of many leading intellectuals,
if adopted, would lead to the destruction of the Georgian language there and
its replacement by Russian.
“The apogee of the controversy came on April
14 when, in the center of Tbilisi, a 100,000-strong crowd of protesters
assembled – older school children, students, members of the intelligentsia and
simply people who weren’t indifferent” to the fate of their language, the Russian
commentator says.
The Georgian action was a brave one, he
continues, because Georgians then could easily recall the harsh response of the
Soviet authorities when Georgians went into the streets in 1956 to protest
Khrushchev’s attack on Stalin, a native son of Georgia. In that clash, more
than 20 were killed and dozens were wounded.
In April 1977, Eduard Shevardnadze, the
head of the Georgian CPSU and thus of the republic, tried to calm the crowd and
even reminded its participants about what had happened in 1956. But the
protesters ignored his calls to disperse and stood up to the police and
security forces arrayed against them.
While the crowd was in the street, the
Georgian republic’s Supreme Soviet assembled and by a majority of votes
approved the retention of the old version of the constitution and its stress on
the primacy of Georgian. And only when Shevardnadze announced that did the
protesters return to their homes.
No one was killed in the 1978 protests,
although some were sent to prison. But
the most important consequences were political: Not only did Georgia retain the
primacy of Georgian but other non-Russians took courage from what had happened
in Tbilisi, began to organize, and took the steps that led inexorably to Beloveshchaya
Pushcha.
No comments:
Post a Comment