Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 9 – The Kremlin has
called for Russian firms to practice import substitution because of sanctions:
that is, Moscow wants Russian businesses to buy more equipment produced by
Russian firms and less coming from foreign ones. But ever more Russian firms are doing exactly
the reverse, buying more abroad and less at home.
That is the conclusion of statistics
gathered in an 18-page report prepared by the Center for Conjunction Research of
Moscow’s Higher School of Economics (issek.hse.ru/data/2019/03/21/1185187659/investment_activity_Russia_2018.pdf;
summarized at iq.hse.ru/news/257492540.html).
Thirty-eight percent of Russian
industrial firms making investment now purchased machines, equipment and
transportation goods from abroad in 2018, a figure up six percent from 2016.
And even firms that did not purchase new equipment from abroad made use of foreign-produced
goods that other Russian firms are no longer using.
The appearance of new technology from
abroad grew particularly in Russia’s extractive industries, rising from 43
percent in 2017 to 55 percent in 2018. Moreover, the study reports, “53percent
of the leaders of enterprises intend to continue to increase the importation of
basic equipment.” And they also plan to continue to use less domestically produced
equipment.
All these figures show, the experts
say, that import substitution, much talked about by the Kremlin, isn’t
happening. And it isn’t happening for a
reason: managers view foreign produced equipment as better made and more
efficient than equivalent equipment produced within the country. As a result, they work hard to acquire it, whatever
the country’s leadership says.
No comments:
Post a Comment