Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 8 – On Sunday, Moscow
Patriarch Kirill elevated to the dignity of metropolitan the man he has chosen
to head the exarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church in Belarus and declared he
had appointed Veniamen because the nationality factor has become ever more
important in Russia’s Western neighbor.
Specifically, Kirill said, “we came to
the conclusion about the necessity of having at the head of the Belarusian
Church a man who was born in Belarus, knows Belarusian and was raised in a
Belarusian milieu” instead of his predecessor Pavel who was born in Kazakhstan
and carried a Russian passport (regnum.ru/news/polit/3056329.html).
Regnum commentator Geogry Shklovsky
says that Kirill believes that by “nativizing” the Russian Orthodox Church in
Belarus, he will be better positioned to block any demands that may arise for
autocephaly there; but there is a risk that this and related moves will have
exactly the opposite effect and spark more calls for Belarus to have its own
national church.
The pro-Western opposition in
Belarus” was hostile to Pavel when he was appointed, viewing him as an agent of
the Kremlin, and some of them called for separating the Belarusian exarchate
from the ROC MP and making it a self-standing autocephalous church. But Pavel felt confident he had put off such
talk for 25 or even 50 years (regnum.ru/news/polit/1885733.html).
A major reason Pavel felt that way
was the he continued the poicy of his predecessor of “rooting” (korenizatisya)
of the church in Belarus, promoting the use of the Belarusian language in
services and the translation of the Bible into Belarusian. But the parishes of the ROC in Belarus
remained overwhelmingly Russian-speaking.
Pavel’s policies within the church
were overshadowed by his deference to Alyaksandr Lukashenka whom he supported in
all things, thus offending many Belarusian nationalists and even some of his
own hierarchs like Grodno Archbishop Artemiy, whose anti-Lukashenka views Pavel
disowned.
According to Skhlovsky, “until recently,
the Belarusian exarchate of the ROC was a model of success of broad autonomy
without formal proclamation of autonomy.”
But now, that pattern has been violated. The Orthodox faithful in
Belarus have been affected by what is going on in Belarusian life, and the
Moscow Patriarchate has now made a nod in their direction.
Kirill clearly believes that this
will restore the situation that existed before the presidential elections and
protests about them, but it is at least possible that having won this
concession from Moscow, some in Belarus, including in the ROC there, will
demand more – and it is not clear to what new defensive line Kirill can
withdraw.
No comments:
Post a Comment