Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 11 – The current
regional elections, in a development that will cast a shadow on the Duma vote
later, show that “genuine politicians have left systemic public politics in
Russia,” preferring instead to pursue careers within the bureaucracy and
leaving in their place “statists without a will to power, for whom victory has
become a burden,” Andrey Pertsev says.
Paralleling the difficulties Russia
has had with recreating a farmer-based agriculture after the Soviets destroyed
the peasantry, the country now has a problem with creating a public politics
after the Putin regime destroyed the possibilities for real politicians to engage,
the Moscow journalist says (carnegie.ru/commentary/82683).
The
Kremlin has gone into these elections committed to maintaining the same farce
it has been organizing for some years, ignoring protests and polls showing how angry
Russians are at the systemic parties in general and the ostensibly ruling
United Russia Party in particular, Pertsev continues.
On
Sunday, gubernatorial elections will take place in 18 federal subjects, but
only in two – Arkhangelsk and Irkutsk Oblasts – is there much chance of things
going to a second round – and in them only because they are traditional sites
of protest voting and because elections in them are by Russian standards
relatively honest, Pertsev says.
In
these two, any Kremlin defeat will have less to do with the strength of the opposition
than with the weakness of the center’s choices. It could have selected others
to run who would have spoken to the concerns of those who are protesting, but
instead, the powers that be decided to continue on as if no one was upset.
The
Kremlin did create a few new parties to provide society with “new faces,” but
it has already become obvious that these organizations haven’t been able to
attract any heavyweights or even serious young people who recognize that these
are hidings to nothing and prefer to pursue other careers.
Businessmen
no longer want to be involved in parties because of the risk, and the parties
aren’t able to offer comprehensive programs.
They give people “nothing new” but rather dated quasi-liberal or
ultra-patriotic nostrums. Thus, “Prilepin talks about the Donbass but not the nationality
question, and New People about freedom for business but not about a
change in direction.”
As a result, “both the gubernatorial
and deputy elections in the regions show” and this is likely to be confirmed in
the Duma races next year “that politicians are leaving Russian public politics.
The old figures are leaving or quietly holding on to their customary places,
and the new prefer bureaucratic careers.“ The only ones running are timeservers waiting
for their main chance.
No comments:
Post a Comment