Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 5 – The much-ballyhooed
gas deal Vladimir Putin signed with Beijing will only have an “insignificant”
impact on Russia’s economic development and state revenues, according to an analysis
by experts at the Center of Development of the Moscow Higher School of
Economics.
Their 43-page report is available at
opec.ru/data/2014/06/04/1233922990/KGB_70f.pdf. Its main conclusions are provided by Nikolay
Kondrashov in an excerpt that is posted at opec.ru/1714558.html.
The micro impact of the May 21 agreement, that
involving Gazprom, the economist says, is quite difficult to predict because many
of the parameters set by the accord have not been released. But the
macro-economic impact of the agreement is clearer and “useful to know,” he adds.
The macro effects, Kondrashov says,
are the impact the deal will have on investment in Russian infrastructure, on income
from the sale of gas to China, and on the revenues the Russian state treasury
will receive from such sales.
The agreement calls for 55 billion
US dollars of investment in Russian infrastructure, spread over seven
years. How much of an impact such
investments will have on the economy depends on how large a share imports form
of these investment projects and whether these investments will stimulate
broader economic activity in the sectors where they occur.
Russia has the capacity to produce
large-diameter pipeline, Kondrashov says. Indeed, its capacity in that area is
currently underused. Consequently, any expansion of production will not have
the same multiplier effect it would have if its plants were working at full
capacity. Another limiting factor is
what amount of raw materials Russia may have to import.
According to Kondrashov, he and his
experts do not expect such infrastructure investments to boost the growth of
the Russian economy a percent in some years and less in others and then only
until 2021. After that, he suggests, whatever investments have been made will
have little impact on growth.
Russia will earn money from the sale
of gas to China, but the impact of these sales on the economy as a whole will
be small in the near term and equal to “zero” in the longer term. But there is “one
constant positive effect,” the Moscow economist suggests. This deal will boost
the revenues of the government. Indeed, the state treasury is “the chief beneficiary”
of the deal.
No comments:
Post a Comment